\caption{\label{kmt} Transverse mass spectra at midrapidity for $K^{+}$ (a) and $K^{-}$ (b) mesons. Together with the results at 80~A$\cdot$GeV (\fullcircle) the scaled results from 40 (\opencircle, $\times 0.1$)\cite{NA49QM01} and 158~A$\cdot$GeV (\opensquare, $\times 10$)\cite{NA49QM99} are plotted. The solid line indicates the fit results (see text for further details)}
\caption{\label{krap} Rapidity spectra of $K^{+}$ (a) and $K^{-}$ (b) mesons produced in 80~$A\cdot$GeV Pb+Pb collisions. Full circles (\fullcircle) show the results of the $\textrm{d}E/\textrm{d}x$-only analysis, squares (\fullsquare) the results from combined TOF-$\textrm{d}E/\textrm{d}x$ analysis. The measured $y$ spectra are reflected at midrapidity, shown by the open symbols (\opencircle)}
\caption{\label{pi} Rapidity spectra of $\pi^{-}$ mesons produced in 80~$A\cdot$GeV Pb+Pb collisions. The measured $y$ spectra (\fullcircle) are reflected at midrapidity, shown by open symbols (\opencircle). }
\caption[]{Tully-Fisher diagram for 15 disk galaxies between z=0.6 and 1.6, derived from ISAAC H$\alpha $ rotation curves. The local Tully-Fisher curve is denoted by a thick blue line. The z\symbol{126}1 data are consistent with the same slope as that of the local curve, but appear to require a brightening of 1.5 mag in the rest-B band}
\caption{~~~ Communication networks. Data on the World Wide Web from http://www.nd.edu/\symbol{126}networks contains $N=325729$ documents and $K=1090108$ links \protect\cite{barabasi1}, while the Internet database is taken from http://moat.nlanr.net and has $N=6474$ nodes and $K=12572$ links. Both systems are studied as unweighted graphs and are examples of economic small worlds.}
\caption{Electron diffraction patterns observed in the pseudo-cubic \TEXTsymbol{<}110\TEXTsymbol{>} zone of PbZr$_{0.52}$Ti$_{0.48}$O$_{3}$ at 87 K in two different areas, showing strong (a) and weak (b) superlattice reflections. The dark field images formed by the superlattice reflections are shown in c) and d) for two regions with strong and weak superlattice peaks, respectively}
\caption{Sketch of the reciprocal lattice expected in the pseuco-cubic \TEXTsymbol{<}110\TEXTsymbol{>} zone for a) the monoclinic Cm phase; b) the monoclinic Cc phase; c) and d) the monoclinic Pc phase (here using Pc indices for clarity). e) Real-space projection of the octahedral framework on the pseudo-cubic ($\overline{1}$10) plane, showing the tilt pattern responsible for the observed sl reflections. Oxygen atoms are located at the vertices of the octahedra, Zr/Ti are located at the center of the octahedra. Solid and open circles represent Zr/Ti at y=0 and y=1/2, respectively. Pb atoms are omitted for clarity. The projection of the new Ic unit cell (ABCD) with a doubled $c$-constant, formed after the anti-phase tilting along the pseudo-cubic [111] direction, is marked by dashed lines. The Cc unit cell (ABDE) with $a_{m}^{\prime }$= $\protect\sqrt{3}$ $a_{m}$$\simeq $ 10.1 \AA \thinspace\$b_{m}^{\prime }$= $b_{m}$$\simeq $ 5.71 \AA \thinspace\$% c_{m}^{\prime }$= $2c_{m}$$\simeq $ 8.27 \AA \thinspace\and$\protect\beta $% $\simeq $ $145.5^{o}$ is indicated by the thick lines.}
\caption{Electron diffraction patterns in the \TEXTsymbol{<}211\TEXTsymbol{>} (a) and \TEXTsymbol{<}110\TEXTsymbol{>} (b) zones at about 87 K. Insets 1-4 show an enlargement of the regions indicated by arrows, respectively. (a) shows two M$_{A}$ variants, V$_{0}$ and V$_{1}$(inset 2), which have a reflection twin relationship with ($\overline{1}$01) as their twin plane. Both M$_{A}$ variants have superlattice spots as shown in inset 1. In (b) the fundamental spots split into three sets of spots, which correspond to three M$_{A}$ variants V$_{0}$, V$_{2}$ and V$_{3}$. The V$_{0}$ and V$_{2}$% , and V$_{0}$ and V$_{3}$, both yield a reflection twin relationship with (101) and (011) as their twin planes, respectively. Careful examination shows that there is only one set of superlattice spots, which correspond to the V$_{3}$ spots, indicating that only V$_{3}$ shows the minority phase.}
\caption{\textit{Left panel:} Contour plot of the \chisq-landscape for the spectral flux in the \bqua,\theq-plane. The input configuration is given by \mbox{\bdip\= 40\,MG}, \mbox{\bqua\= 20\,MG}, and \mbox{\thed\=\theq\= 0\degr}. Darker shading corresponds to smaller values of \chisqred. \textit{Centre panel:}{\bpd}s of the field configurations corresponding to the local \textit{(top)} and the global \textit{(bottom)} minimum. \textit{Right panel:} Flux and circular polarization spectra corresponding to the the global minimum (lower curves) and the local minimum in the upper left of the left panel (upper curves, shifted upwards by 0.5 units in flux and 0.1 units in polarization).}
\caption{Aitoff maps of the magnetic field strength $B$ (in MG) for Model (A1). The input \textit{(top)} and the high-noise flux-only reconstruction of Table~\ref{tab:input}, Model (A1), line~10 \textit{(bottom)} are shown. The axis of the maps represents the rotation axis. The centre of the maps marks the $-x_0$ direction (see Fig.~\ref{fig:geometry}b). The region within 30\degr\from the lower pole is permanently hidden (dashed white line).}
\caption{C/T vs T, x=0.5,0.8,0.95, fit to T\symbol{94}(-1+lambda)}
\caption{Chi vs T fit to T\symbol{94}(-1+lambda)}
\caption{\label{fig:chirplet}Measured combined impulse response (chirplet) for sonar pulse, emitter, receiver, and auditory bandpass filter model (\full). The auditory bandpass model parameters $f_c=\unit[50]{kHz}$ and $Q_{\unit[-3]{dB}}=10$ are used throughout the reported work and result in a \unit[-3]{dB} impulse response duration of $\sim\unit[260]{\textrm{\textmu}s}$. The actual data of the combined impulse response was collected by directing the sonar head at a plane in $\sim\unit[1.8]{m}$ distance; in the graph, it is compared to a simplified model which omits the transducer transfer functions (\dashed).}
\caption{\label{fig:dt_pdf}Probability density function estimates for the elementary interspike intervals \isi{m}{m+1} for the four foliage types sycamore (\opencircle), linden (\opensquare), maple (\opentriangledown), hornbeam ($\ast$). Shown are kernel density estimates using a normal kernel with $\unit[1]{\textrm{\textmu}s}$ smoothing bandwidth. Dashed line: normalized autocorrelation function $R_{xx}(\tau)/\sigma^2$ of the chirplet shown in \fref{fig:chirplet}.}
\caption{Examples of soft magnetic materials and their hierarchy according to $\lambda_{s}$. The main composition is successively based on Fe, NiFe and finally Co. A commercial compound, close to the last family, Vitrovac 6025~\textregistered or Co$_{66}$~Fe$_{4}$~Mo$_{2}$~Si$_{16}$~B$_{12}$ has \cite{murillo} $\lambda_{s}=-1.4 \hspace{1mm} 10^{-7}$}
\caption{Primary fitting parameters with formal errors as determined in the \chisquare-fits shown in Figs.~\ref{fig:oneone} and~\ref{fig:twotwo}. We label $\tau_0$ as the \emph{total opacity} of the transition; it is the the sum of the central opacities of the individual hyperfine components (all gaussian with \mbox{$\mbox{FWHM} = \DV$}) of the inversion transition in question. The small discrepancy between the two transitions in the line-of-sight velocities is also present in the (otherwise unused) second polarization channel. Possible reasons are a mis-positioning of the spectrometers (by 0.2 channels), an inaccuracy in the rest frequency difference (of 2.8~kHz or 0.01\,\%) or a combination of rotation (of the globule) and different opacities. \label{tab:parameters}}
\caption{\label{Fig.1} Crystal structure of $\alpha$-LiIO$_3$, with \textcolor[rgb]{.5,.1,.1}{$\bullet$} = Li, \textcolor[rgb]{.6,0,.05}{$\bullet$} = O, and \textcolor[rgb]{0,.5,.5}{$\bullet$} = I.}
\caption{\label{Fig.2} Corundum and monoclinic structures of V$_2$O$_3$. (\textcolor[rgb]{1,0,0}{$\bullet$} and \textcolor[rgb]{0,1,0}{$\bullet$} denote different orientations of the oxygen octahedra.) The AFM structure is also displayed.}
\caption{\label{fig:jwdbfig}{\bf JetWeb Database.} The diagram shows the tables of the JetWeb database, their primary keys, the relationships between the tables and the fields on the tables pertaining to those relationships. A {\it paper} (identified by paper\_id) may have one or more{\it crosssections}, while each {\it crosssection} record (identified by a csn\_id) has a single paper\_id associated with it. A{\it crosssection} (equivalent to {\it Plot} in the java object model) may have a set of {\it data\_points} or {\it predicted\_points} or a {\it fitted\_prediction}. A {\it fit} compares a {\it model} to a set of {\it crosssections}, as specified by its {\it crosssection\_set}. Each {\it model} may have up to three associated logparms records; one each for electron-electron, electron-proton and proton-proton.}
\caption{\label{fig:eight} The lemniscate and the positions of $\mathbf{x}(t)$ with modulus $k^2=(2+\sqrt{3})/4$ at $t=jK/3$ for $j=0,1,2,...,11$. Full circles \fullcircle labeled by $j$ represent the positions of $\mathbf{x}(t)$. }
\caption{\label{fig:hyperbola} Snapshot at $t=-K/6$. Three tangent lines from the choreographic three bodies meet at a point on the rectangular hyperbola. %%Filled circles Full circles \fullcircle are positions of the three bodies. %Three tangent lines from the three bodies meet at a point %on the rectangular hyperbola. }
\caption{ {\red Comparison of the calculated, parameter-free LDA+DMFT(QMC) spectra of SrVO$_{3}$ (solid line) and CaVO$_{3}$ (dashed line) with bulk-sensitive high-resolution PES (SrVO$_{3}$: circles; CaVO$_{3}$: rectangles) ~\protect\cite{Sekiyama02} (left panel) and 1s XAS spectra (SrVO$_{3}$: diamonds; Ca$_{0.9}$Sr$_{0.1}$VO$_{3}$: triangles)~\protect\cite{Inoue94} (right panel). Horizontal line: experimental subtraction of the background intensity.} \protect\vspace{-0.3cm} \label{fig_XPS}}
\caption{ a) -- $\eta\phi$, b) -- $\phi$ and c) -- $\eta$ directional components of the dynamic texture in HIJING (events with impact parameter between 0 and 3 fm), arising primarily due to jets. Data sets with different $p_T$ bin widths, indicated by the open and solid symbols, are statistically consistent at both scales when the ``coherent'' normalization is included. \textcolor{blue}{$\bullet$} \textcolor{blue}{$\circ$}-- scale 1; \textcolor{green}{$\bullet$} \textcolor{green}{$\circ$} -- scale 2. Enhanced fineness scale 2 of the $\phi$ texture plot (b) reflects back-to-back correlations. }
\caption{\label{STAR_peripheral} $(P^{\eta}_{true}-P^{\eta}_{mix})/P^{\eta}_{mix}/N$ for scale 1, peripheral events. Open stars -- STAR data for $\sqrt{s}=200$ GeV, $0.014<\mbox{mult}/n_0<0.1$. \textcolor{blue}{$\bullet$} -- HIJING at the same energy, $\mbox{mult}/n_0<0.1$. }
\caption{$(P^{\eta}_{true}-P^{\eta}_{mix})/P^{\eta}_{mix}/N$ for scale 1, central events ($0.65<\mbox{mult}/n_0<1.$). Open stars -- STAR data for $\sqrt{s}=200$ GeV. \textcolor{blue}{$\bullet$} -- regular HIJING; \textcolor{blue}{$\circ$} -- HIJING with jet quenching, both at $\sqrt{s}=130 GeV$. }
\caption{$(P^{\eta}_{true}-P^{\eta}_{mix})/P^{\eta}_{mix}$ (scale 1) in Au Au collisions at $\sqrt{s}=130$ GeV as a function of normalized multiplicity for {\bf all charged} particles. \textcolor{red}{$\star$} -- STAR; \textcolor{blue}{$\bullet$} -- regular HIJING; \textcolor{black}{$\circ$} -- HIJING without jets. }
\caption{$(P^{\eta}_{true}-P^{\eta}_{mix})/P^{\eta}_{mix}$ (scale 1) in Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s}=130$ GeV as a function of normalized multiplicity for {\bf positively} charged particles. \textcolor{red}{$\star$} -- STAR; \textcolor{blue}{$\bullet$} -- regular HIJING; \textcolor{black}{$\circ$} -- HIJING without jets. }
\caption{$(P^{\eta}_{true}-P^{\eta}_{mix})/P^{\eta}_{mix}$ (scale 1) in Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s}=130 GeV$ as a function of normalized multiplicity for {\bf negatively} charged particles. \textcolor{red}{$\star$} -- STAR; \textcolor{blue}{$\bullet$} -- regular HIJING; \textcolor{black}{$\circ$} -- HIJING without jets.}
\caption{% The critical behavior at $\epsilon\to 1$. Points (\textcolor{red}{$+$}) are results of numerical integration. The \slaninalineonethree\% is the approximation (\ref{eq:sigma-has-exp-half-analytically}), while the \slaninalinetwo\is the exact upper bound$\sigma_{\rm upper}(\epsilon)$ given by formula (\ref{eq:sigmaupperbound}). }
\caption{a) Currents which flow in a fully-magnetized super\-con\-ducting ring with a weak link and vector diagrams explaining their distribution inside the diamond-shaped area b) above and c) below a weak link.}
\caption{Theoretical and experimental values $z_0$ in the cut rings (CR) \magenta{consisting of two 180$^\circ$-arcs ($N=2$). The} estimates for the intra\-grain current density$j_m$ are also included.}
\caption{Nodal domain distributions (\opendiamond) of the unperturbed quantum cat map (a) and of its perturbation~\eref{mephi} with $k=0.30$ (b) compared with the Gaussian~\eref{limitgaus} (\full). The dimension of the Hilbert space is $N=3511$.}
\caption{(a) Scaled number of nodal domains $x(k)=\nu(k)/N$ of an eigenvector of the matrix~\eref{mephi}, with $N=1069$, as a function of the perturbation parameter $k$; (b) value distribution of $x(k)$ averaged over all eigenvectors (\opendiamond) compared with the Gaussian~\eref{limitgaus} (\full).}