\caption{Wavefunctions of the F$^-$ ground state, effective intermediate state and final state of the photoelectron. (a) Radial wavefunction of the $2p$ subshell of F$^-$ in the HF approximation (\full ~, $E_{2p}^{\rm HF}=-0.362$ Ryd), and that with a model potential added to reproduce the experimental energy (\chain ~, $E_{2p}=-0.250$ Ryd). The inset shows the same wavefunctions on the logarithmic scale, together with the radial Roothaan-HF $2p$ radial wavefunction of F$^-$ from Clementi and Roetti (1974), \dashed . (b) \full ~, HF $2p$ wavefunction; \longbroken ~, effective wavefunction $P_\omega (r)$, equation (\protect\ref{sh}), of the intermediate $d$ state at $\omega =0.226$ Ryd; \chain ~, final state $p$ ($^1D$) wavefunction, $\varepsilon =0.09$ Ryd; \dashed ~, integrand of equation (\protect\ref{dme1}) for the 2-photon amplitude $M_{pd}$. \label{functions}}
\caption{2-photon detachment cross sections. Present calculations: \dashed , HF wavefunctions of the $2p$, intermediate and final states; \full , same with the corrected $2p$ wavefunction; \chain , using plane waves in the intermediate and final state; \longbroken , HF wave functions combined with the experimental $2p$ energy; \protect\fullcirc , adiabatic theory (equation (5) of Gribakin and Kuchiev 1997b). Other results: $\protect\opensqr $ and $\protect\opencirc $, calculations by Pan \etal (1990) with the HF and experimental binding energies, respectively; $\protect\fullsqr $, experiment (Kwon \etal 1989). \label{crosssec}}
\caption{Photoelectron angular distribution parameters. Present calculation: \longbroken , HF wavefunctions of the initial, intermediate and final states, experimental $2p$ energy; \full , corrected $2p$ wavefunction, HF intermediate and final states; \chain , same with the plane wave in the intermediate and final states; \protect\fullcirc , $\beta $ parameters obtained from the adiabatic theory (equations (3), (4) of Gribakin and Kuchiev 1997b). Other results: $\protect\opencirc $, correlated length results by Pan and Starace (1991); $\protect\fullsqr $, experiment (Blondel and Delsart 1993). \label{angasym}}
\caption{FIGURE 2. \gray\line fluxes and$^{12}\mathrm{C}^{\ast}/^{16}\mathrm{O}^{\ast}$ line ratio as function of cut-off energy $E_{0}$ for different association ages $t_{6}$ ($\equiv 10^6$ years; labelled by an additional `-$t_{6}$').}
\caption[strong3a.ps,strong3b.ps]{ {\it Left panel:} Interstellar $\bar{p}/p$ ratio for different ambient proton spectra (Moskalenko et al.\1998, Strong et al.\1999) compared with data. Solid line: C, dotted line: HN, dashed line: HEMN. Data (direct measurements): see references in Moskalenko et al.\(1998). {\it Right panel:} Interstellar positron spectra for different ambient proton spectra (Strong et al.\1999) compared with data. Lines are coded as on the left. Data (direct measurements): Barwick et al.\(1998). \label{fig3}}
\caption[strong4a.ps,strong4b.ps]{ Gamma-ray energy spectrum of the inner Galaxy ($300^\circ \le l\le 30^\circ$, $|b|\le 5^\circ$) compared with our model calculations. Data: EGRET (Strong \& Mattox 1996), COMPTEL (Strong et al.\1998), OSSE ($l=0, 25^\circ$: Kinzer et al.\1997).{\it Left panel:} \gray spectrum of inner Galaxy compared to models with a hard electron spectrum. {\it Right panel:} The same compared to the HEMN model. \label{fig4}}
\caption[strong5a.ps,strong5b.ps]{ Distributions of 1--2 GeV \grays computed for a hard electron spectrum (reacceleration model) as compared to EGRET data (Cycles 1--4, point sources removed, see Strong et al.\1999). Contribution of various components is shown as calculated in our model.{\it Left panel:} Latitude distribution ($330^\circ <l <30^\circ$). {\it Right panel:} Longitude distribution for $|b|<5^\circ$. \label{fig5}}
\caption{Comparison of thresholds for $\mup =0.6$, $A=a=0.1$ and $T=0$. Threshold choices: $Q_c$ \dashed, $Q_m$ \chain, $Q_a$ \broken, $Q_r$ \longbroken.}
\caption{Critical temperature $T_c (\mdo)$ for $\mup =0.5$ \dashed, $\mup =0.9$ \broken, $\mup =0.999$ \longbroken. Data with $N=2000$, $\alpha =0.0005$ and $\mup=0.5$ ($\star$, $a=0.3$ and $c=0.5$), $\mup=0.9$ ($\opendiamond$, $a=0.3$ and $c=1$) and $\mup=0.999$ ($\opensquare$, $a=0.5$ and $c=1$).}
\caption{Two-photon detachment cross sections of F$^-$. Present calculations: \dashed , HF wavefunctions of the $2p$, intermediate and final states; \full , same with the $2p$ wavefunction from the Dyson equation. Other results: \dotted , calculations by Pan \etal (1990) with correlations and experimental binding energies; \chain , $R$-matrix Floquet method by Hart (1996); $\protect\fullsqr $, model calculations by Robinson and Geltman (1967); $\protect\fullcirc $, experiment (Kwon \etal 1989). \label{fcross}}
\caption{Photoelectron angular distribution parameters for F$^-$. \dotted, the HF $\beta_2 $ parameter; \chain , the HF $\beta_4 $ parameter; \full , $\beta_2 $ parameter with the Dyson $2p$ wavefunction; \dashed , $\beta_4 $ parameter with the Dyson $2p$ wavefunction. $\protect\fullsqr $, experiment (Blondel and Delsart 1993); $\protect\opencirc $, correlated length results by Pan and Starace (1991). \label{fangul1}}
\caption{Two-photon detachment cross sections of Cl$^-$. Present calculations: \dashed , HF wavefunctions of the $3p$, intermediate and final states; \full , same with the $3p$ wavefunction from the Dyson equation. Other results: \dotted , calculations by Jiang and Starace (1988); \chain , $R$-matrix Floquet method by Hart (1996); $\protect\opencirc $, HF calculations by Crance (1987); $\protect\fullsqr $, model calculations by Robinson and Geltman (1967); $\protect\fullcirc $, experiment (Trainham \etal 1987). \label{clcross}}
\caption{Photoelectron angular distribution parameters for Cl$^-$. \dotted, the HF $\beta_2 $ parameter; \chain , the HF $\beta_4 $ parameter; \full , $\beta_2 $ parameter with the Dyson $2p$ wavefunction; \dashed , $\beta_4 $ parameter with the Dyson $2p$ wavefunction. $\protect\opensqr $, experiment (Blondel \etal 1992); $\protect\fullcirc $ and $\protect\opencirc $, calculations in the plane-wave approximation and with the first Born correction, respectively (Blondel \etal 1992). \label{clangul}}
\caption{Two-photon detachment cross sections of Br$^-$. \dashed , HF wavefunctions of the $4p$, intermediate and final states; \full , same with the $4p_{3/2}$ wavefunction from the Dyson equation; \chain , same with the correct $4p_{1/2}$ wavefunction; $\protect\fullsqr $, model calculations by Robinson and Geltman (1967). \label{brcross}}
\caption{Photoelectron angular distribution parameters for Br$^-$. (a) $\beta _2$ (\full) and $\beta _4$ (\dashed ) parameters for $4p_{3/2}$ state. $\protect\opensqr $, experiment (Blondel \etal 1992); $\protect\fullcirc $ and $\protect\opencirc $, calculations in the plane-wave approximation and with the first Born correction, respectively (Blondel \etal 1992). (b) The same for the $\beta _2$ and $\beta _4$ parameters for $4p_{1/2}$ state. \label{brangul}}
\caption{Two-photon detachment cross sections of I$^-$. \dashed , HF wavefunctions of the $5p$, intermediate and final states; \full , same with the $5p_{3/2}$ wavefunction from the Dyson equation; \chain , same with the $5p_{1/2}$ wavefunction from the Dyson equation; $\protect\fullsqr $, model calculations by Robinson and Geltman (1967). \label{icross}}
\caption{Photoelectron angular distribution parameters for I$^-$. (a) $\beta _2$ (\full) and $\beta _4$ (\dashed ) parameters for $5p_{3/2}$ state. $\protect\opensqr $ and $\protect\fullsqr $, experimental data of Blondel \etal (1992) and Blondel and Delsart (1993), respectively; $\protect\fullcirc $ and $\protect\opencirc $, calculations in the plane-wave approximation and with the first Born correction, respectively (Blondel \etal 1992). (b) The same for the $\beta _2$ and $\beta _4$ parameters for $5p_{1/2}$ state. \label{iangul}}
\caption{{Optical depth versus energy for \grays\originating at various redshifts obtained using the SEDs corresponding to the lower IIRF (solid lines) and higher IIRF (dashed lines) levels shown in a Figure taken from SD98. As discussed in the text, the higher IIRF curves (dashed lines) are more in line with recent data.}}
\caption{{ The opacity $\tau$ of the universal soft photon background to \grays\as a function of\gray\energy and source redshift (from SS98)\protect\cite{ss98}. These curves are calculated with and without a metallicity correction. }}
\caption{{ The critcal energy for \gray\absorption above which the optical depth is predicted to be greater than 1 as a function of the redshift of the source (from the results of SS98)\protect\cite{ss98} (see text).}}
\caption[]{Log of the observations and stellar parameters}{!}{\includegraphics{tabnlte1.eps}}
\caption[]{Data for JOLA opacities used in this work}{!}{\includegraphics{tabnlte2.eps}}
\caption[]{LTE/NLTE lithium abundances in the stars studied}{!}{\includegraphics{tabnlte3.eps}}
\caption{ $C_{\ell }$ spectrum for various models (actually we plot $[\ell(\ell+1)C_{\ell}/2\pi]^{1/2}$, as customary). Notice the shift of the peak location for the different values of $p$, in agreement with the approximation given in the text. The amplitude decreases for $p\neq 2/3$ (except for values slightly larger than 2/3) and, for a given $p,$ decreases for smaller $\Omega _{\phi }$ , as expected. \The data points are from Tegmark's home page (http:// www.sns.ias.edu/\symbol{126}max). }
\caption[]{{\it Left}: \BC\interstellar and modulated to 500 MV for diffusive reacceleration model with$z_h$ = 4 kpc. Data compilation: Webber et al.\(1996). %, filled circles: DuVernois et al.\ (1996). {\it Right}: The same for \Ferat\$(Z=21-23/\,^{56}$Fe). Data: \odiamond -- Engelmann et al.\(1990), \otriangle -- Binns et al.\(1988). \label{fig2} }
\caption[]{ Model interstellar and modulated (500 MV) ratios. {\it Left}: \Berat. Data from Lukasiak et al.\(1994a) (\obox -- Voyager--1,2, \ocircle -- IMP--7/8, \otriangle -- ISEE--3) and Connell (1998) (\fcircle -- Ulysses). {\it Right}: \Alrat. Data: \ocircle -- Lukasiak et al.\(1994b), \fcircle -- Simpson and Connell (1998). Note that the data points shown are at the measured (not interstellar) energies. \label{fig3} }
\caption[]{Model interstellar and modulated (500 MV) ratios. {\it Left}: \Clrat. Data: Connell et al.\(1998); \\ {\it Right}: \Mnrat. Data: \fcircle -- Duvernois (1997), \ocircle -- Lukasiak et al.\(1995), \otriangle -- Leske (1993). \label{fig4} }
\caption[OG_2.4.03_f2.ps]{ High latitude distribution (enlarged) of 70--100 MeV \grays from the EGRET compared to our model calculation. Separate components: IC (dashes), bremsstrahlung (thin histogram), $\pi^0$-decay (thick histogram), horizonal line: isotropic background. EGRET data (point sources removed): dotted line. \vspace{1\baselineskip}\vspace{2pt} \label{fig2}}
\caption[OG_2.4.03_f3a.ps,OG_2.4.03_f3b.ps]{ Energy spectrum of \grays from high Galactic latitudes ($|b|\ge 70^\circ$, all longitudes) for $z_h=4$ kpc (left) and $z_h=10$ kpc (right). Shaded areas: EGRET total intensity from Cycle 1--4 data. COMPTEL data: high-latitude total intensity (open boxes: Bloemen et al.\1999, diamonds: Kappadath 1998, crosses: Weidenspointner et al.\1999).\label{fig3} }
\caption{Apparent 6s6p$^1$P$_1$ integral excitation cross sections: \opencircle, CCC; \opentriangle, CC(55); \fullcircle, Chen and Galagher ~\protect\cite{CG76}. The solid line represents our recommended values. }
\caption{\rm Cascade contribution to the 6s6p $^1$P$_1$ level apparent excitation cross section: \opencircle, CCC; \opentriangle, CC(55). The solid line represents our recommended values.}
\caption{Integral cross sections for excitation of the 6s6p$^1$P$_1$ level: \opencircle, CCC; \opentriangle, CC(55);\opensquare, UFOMBT; $\times$, CC(2) Fabrikant \protect\cite{Fabrikant80}; +, RDWA Srivastava \etal \protect\cite{SZMS92}; \fullcircle, obtained from apparent cross section of Chen and Galagher \protect\cite{CG76} by subtracting theoretical (CCC and CC(55)) estimate of cascade contribution. The solid line represents our recommended values. }
\caption{Integrated cross sections for excitation of the 6s5d$^1$D$_2$ level: \opencircle, CCC; \opentriangle, CC(55); \opensquare, UFOMBT; +, RDWA Srivastava \etal \protect\cite{SMS92}. The solid line represents our recommended values. }
\caption{Ionization cross sections: \opencircle, CCC ($Q^+$); \opensquare, ($Q_i$) and \fullsquare, ($Q^+$) Dettmann and Karstensen \protect\cite{DK82}; \opendiamond, ($Q_i$) Vainshtein \etal \protect\cite{VORS72}. }
\caption{Integral elastic cross sections: \opencircle,~CCC; \opentriangle,~CC(55); +, Gregory and Fink ~\protect\cite{GF74}; $\times$,~CC(2) Fabrikant \protect\cite{Fabrikant80}; \opentriangledown, Szmytkowski and Sienkiewicz ~\protect\cite{SS94}; \opendiamond, Yuan and Zhang ~\protect\cite{YZ90}; *, Kelemen \etal ~\protect\cite{KRS95}. The solid line represents our recommended values. }
\caption{Total electron scattering cross sections: \opencircle, CCC; \opentriangle, CC(55); $\times$, CC(2) Fabrikant \protect\cite{Fabrikant80}; *, Kelemen \etal \protect\cite{KRS95}; \fullsquare, Romanyuk \etal \protect\cite{RSZ80}. The solid line represents our recommended values.}
\caption{Multipole spectra $C_{\ell }$ (actually we plot $\left[ \ell \left( \ell +1\right) C_{\ell }/2\pi \right] ^{1/2}\mu $K, as customary) for the solutions $a$. The data are a selection from Tegmark's home page (http://www.sns.ias.edu/ \symbol{126}max). }
\caption[]{ {\it Left}: B/C interstellar and modulated to 500 MV for diffusive reacceleration model with $z_h$ = 4 kpc. Data compilation: \inlinecite{Webber96}. {\it Right}: The same for \Ferat. Data: \odiamond -- \inlinecite{Engelmann90}, \otriangle -- \inlinecite{Binns88}. }
\caption[]{ Model interstellar and modulated (500 MV) ratios. {\it Left}: \Berat. Data from \inlinecite{Lukasiak94a} (\obox -- Voyager--1,2, \ocircle -- IMP--7/8, \otriangle -- ISEE--3) and \inlinecite{Connell98} (\fcircle -- Ulysses). {\it Right}: \Alrat. Data: \ocircle -- \inlinecite{Lukasiak94b}, \fcircle -- \inlinecite{SimpsonConnell98}. Note that the data points shown are at the measured (not interstellar) energies. }
\caption[]{ {\it Left:} Gamma-ray energy spectrum of the inner Galaxy ($300^\circ \le l\le 30^\circ$, $|b|\le 5^\circ$) compared with our best model calculations ($z_h = 4$ kpc). Curves show the contribution of IC, bremsstrahlung, and $\pi^0$-decay, and the total. Data: EGRET \cite{StrongMattox96}, COMPTEL \cite{Strong99}, OSSE ($l=0, 25^\circ$: \opencite{Kinzer99}). {\it Right:} Energy spectrum of \grays from high Galactic latitudes ($|b|\ge 70^\circ$, all longitudes). Data: see references in \citeauthor{SMR99}. }
\caption[]{\The contours of the IC 10 15$\mu$m map overlayed on the \ISOcolor\image smoothed to an overall resolution of\about 9\arcsec. Contour separations indicate surface brightness steps of 9 MJy sr$^{-1}$; the lowest contour is at 1 MJy sr$^{-1}$. Coordinates are given in the epoch J2000.}
\caption[]{\The average\ISOcolor\color ratio as a function of mid-infrared surface brightness, with the data for IC 10 simulated as they would appear at the distance of NGC 1313 and NGC 6946 (about 4 Mpc). The model curves drawn in the inset are discussed in Section\ref{sec:model}. We have included the arm/interarm trends from the disk of NGC 6946 (Malhotra et al. 1996).}
\caption[]{\Mid-infrared spectrum for the inner$18\arcsec \times 18\arcsec$ of NGC 6946.}
\caption[]{\The ratio of the weights given to the active and cirrus-like components, as a function of mid-infrared surface brightness.}
\caption{(a) The Hall frequency, $\omega\h$, and (b) the Hall scattering rate, $\gamma\h$, at 8~T as a function of temperature for far-IR (\square= 20-150\cm, and $+$ is from Ref.~\protect\cite{drew}) and mid-IR ($\bullet= 949$\cm, and $\triangle = 1079$\cm) frequencies. The solid line in (b) shows a $T^2$ fit to the mid-IR data, with the dashed line showing the expected mid-IR Hall scattering rate based on Fermi liquid theory (Eq.~\protect\ref{eq;flgamma}). Equation~\protect\ref{eq;invtheta} ceases to be relevant in the hatched region below \tc, but the data are plotted for completeness. }
\caption{Spinodal point noise level $f_s$ for regular and irregular codes. In both constructions parameters are set as $K=L=3$. Irregular codes with $C_o=4$ and $C_e=30$ are used. TAP/BP decoding is carried out with $N=5000$ and a maximum of $500$ iterations; they are denoted by $+$ (regular) and $\ast$ (irregular). Numerical solutions for the RS saddle-point equations are denoted by $\Diamond$ (regular) and $\mbox{\tiny $\bigcirc$}$ (irregular). Shannon's limit is represented by a full line and the upper bound in Section 3 is represented by a dashed line. The symbols are chosen to be larger than the actual error bars.}
\caption{Spinodal point noise level $f_s$ for regular and irregular codes. The constructions are of $K=1$ and $L=2$, irregular codes are parametrised by $C_o=4$ and $C_e=10$. TAP/BP decoding is carried out with $N=5000$ and a maximum of $500$ iterations ; they are denoted by $+$ (regular) and $\ast$ (irregular). Numerical solutions for RS equations are denoted by $\Diamond$ (regular) and $\mbox{\tiny $\bigcirc$}$ (irregular). The coding limit is represented by a line. Symbols are larger than the actual error bars.}
\caption{Spinodal point noise level values $f_s$ for regular and irregular codes. Constructions are of $K=2$ and $L=2$, irregular codes are parametrised by $C_o=3$ and $C_e=8$. TAP/BP decoding is carried out with $N=5000$ and a maximum of $500$ iterations; they are denoted by $+$ (regular) and $\ast$ (irregular). Theoretical predictions are denoted by $\Diamond$ (regular) and $\mbox{\tiny $\bigcirc$}$ (irregular). The coding limit is represented by a line. Symbols are larger than the actual error bars.}
\caption{Comparison between results from numerical integration of (\ref{eq:second_reflection}) or (\ref{eq:G_1}) (\full) and the asymptotic expressions (\ref{eq:G_MB}) (\dotted) and (\ref{eq:G1-simplified}) (\chain) for $-G^{(1)}_{\perp,\beta}/B$ as a function of $\xi$.}
\caption{The self-consistent potentials for $1s_{1/2}$ s.p.\orbit in$J^{\pi} = 1/2^{+}$ many body states (the l.h.s.\picture) and$0d_{5/2}$ s.p.\orbit in$J^{\pi} = 5/2^{+}$ many body states (the r.h.s.\picture) in$^{17}\mbox{F}$ are calculated for the DDSM1 residual interaction (\protect\ref{force1}).}
\caption{Maximal wave number $\bar q_m$ as function of the supercritical induction $\bar B$ for different viscosities. $\bar q_m$ is a monotonously increasing function of $\bar B$ with the exception $\bar q_m=1$ \protect\cite{salin93} in the case of infinitely large viscosities (lower dot-dashed line). In the limit of an inviscid fluid (upper dot-dashed line) the dependence of $\bar q_m$ on $\bar B$ is given by $\bar q_m = (1/3)\left( 2\bar B^2+\sqrt{4\bar B^4-3}\;\right)$ \protect\cite{abou97}.} \label{fig:4} \end{center} \end{figure} \begin{figure}[htbp] \begin{center} \includegraphics[scale=0.45]{qmax_fig5.eps} \caption{Behaviour of $\bar q\bar\delta$ at $\bar q_m$ as a function of the induction for the viscosities $\bar\nu=0.037$, $0.4$, and $2$. The condition $\bar q_m\bar\delta\gg 1$ holds only in the close vicinity of the critical induction, $\bar B \approx 1$, for large viscosities ($\bar\nu =0.4$, $2$) and in the limit $\bar B =1$ for realistic viscosities ($\bar\nu =0.037$).} \label{fig:5} \end{center} \end{figure} \begin{figure}[htbp] \begin{center} \includegraphics[scale=0.45]{qmax_fig6.eps} \caption{Positive purely imaginary growth rates as function of the wave number $q$ and the thickness of the layer at a constant induction of $B=106\cdot 10^{-4}$ T. Remarkably the graph for a layer of $2$ mm is already close to the limit of an infinite thick layer illustrated by $h=100$ mm. Whereas the wave number of maximal growth shows only a small variation, the maximal growth rate itself displays more distinct changes. Material parameters of the fluid EMG 901 are listed in Table \ref{table1}. } \label{fig:6} \end{center} \end{figure} \begin{figure}[htbp] \begin{center} \includegraphics[scale=0.45]{qmax_fig7a.eps} \includegraphics[scale=0.45]{qmax_fig7b.eps} \caption{Maximal wave number $q_m$ (a) and maximal growth rate $\omega_{2,m}$ (b) as function of the supercritical induction $B>B_{c,h}$ for three different thicknesses. (a) $q_m$ increases linearly with $B$ except for $B$ near the critical value $B_{c,h}$. The area of nonlinear behaviour shrinks with the shrinking thickness of the layer. (b) $\omega_{2,m}$ starts to grow like a square root above the onset of the instability. This square root behaviour becomes less pronounced with thinner layers. Material parameters of the fluid EMG 901 are listed in Table \ref{table1}. } \label{fig:7ab} \end{center} \end{figure} \begin{figure}[htbp] \begin{center} \includegraphics[scale=0.45]{qmax_fig8a.eps} \includegraphics[scale=0.45]{qmax_fig8b.eps} \caption{Scaled maximal wave number $\hat q_m$ (a) and scaled maximal growth rate $\hat \omega_{2,m}$ (b) as function of the scaled supercritical induction $\hat B$. The data are calculated for $h=100$ mm ($\circ$), $50$ mm ($\ast$), $10$ mm ($+$), $4$ mm ($\scriptstyle{\square}$), $2$ mm ($\bullet$). For $h\geq 4$ mm the data are fitted by $\hat q_m =3.26 \hat B -0.09\sqrt{\hat B}$ for $\hat q_m$ (solid line (a)) and by $\hat \omega_{2,m} = 1.18\sqrt{\hat B} + 2.9\hat B$ for $\hat \omega_{2,m}$ (solid line (b)). Small deviations from the generic behaviour can be seen for $h=2$ mm (insert). Material parameters of the fluid EMG 901 are listed in Table \ref{table1}.} \label{fig:7cd} \end{center} \end{figure} \begin{figure}[htbp] \begin{center} \includegraphics[scale=0.45]{qmax_fig9a.eps} \includegraphics[scale=0.45]{qmax_fig9b.eps} \caption{Scaled maximal wave number $\hat q_m$ (a) and scaled maximal growth rate $\hat \omega_{2,m}$ (b) as function of the scaled supercritical induction $\hat B$. The data are calculated for $h=100$ mm ($\circ$), $50$ mm ($\ast$), and $10$ mm ($+$). For $\hat B< \bar\nu^2/6$, i.e. $\hat B<4\cdot 10^{-4}$ for EMG 901, the agreement with the analytical results $\hat q_m = (6/\bar\nu^2)\hat B^2 - (18/ \bar\nu^4)\hat B^3$ (solid line (a)) and $\hat \omega_{2,m} =(2/\bar\nu)\hat B - (3/ \bar\nu^3 )\hat B^2$ (solid line (b)) is very good. Material parameters of the fluid EMG 901 are listed in Table \ref{table1}.} \label{fig:7ef} \end{center} \end{figure} \eject \begin{figure}[htbp] \begin{center} \includegraphics[scale=0.45]{qmax_fig10.eps} \caption{The critical induction $B_{c,h}$ versus the thickness of the layer $h$ for three different surface tensions: $\sigma=2.275\cdot 10^{-2}\,{\rm kg}\,{\rm s}^{-2}$ (solid line), $\sigma=2.275\cdot 10^{-1}\,{\rm kg}\,{\rm s}^{-2}$ (dashed line), and $\sigma=2.275\,{\rm kg}\,{\rm s}^{-2}$ (long-dashed line). By increasing the surface tension by a factor of $10$ ($100$), $B_{c,0}$ can be measured for layers nearly 1 (2) orders of magnitude thicker than for a system with the original surface tension. The remaining material parameters of the fluid EMG 901 are listed in Table \ref{table1}. } \label{fig:10} \end{center} \end{figure} \begin{figure} \includegraphics[scale=0.45]{qmax_fig11.eps} \caption{Maximal wave number $\bar q_m$ as function of the supercritical induction $\bar B$ of a thin film, $h=1\mu{\rm m}$, for three different viscosities: $\nu = 6.5\cdot 10^{-8}\,{\rm m}^2\,{\rm s}^{-1}$ ($\circ$), $\nu = 6.5\cdot 10^{-6}\,{\rm m}^2\,{\rm s}^{-1}$ ($\square$), and $\nu = 2.0\cdot 10^{-5}\,{\rm m}^2\,{\rm s}^{-1}$ ($\triangle$). The numerical data show that the behaviour of $\bar q_m$ on $\bar B$ is independent of $\nu$ and it is given by $\bar q_m = (1/4)\left(c + \sqrt{c^2-8}\,\right)$ with $c=3\bar B^2 (\mu_r +1)/(2\mu_r)$ \protect\cite{abou97} (solid line). The remaining material parameters of the fluid EMG 901 are listed in Table \ref{table1}.}
\caption{Three-photon detachment cross sections of F$^-$. Present calculations: \dashed , and \chain , adiabatic theory, equation (5) of Gribakin and Kuchiev (1997b), with parameters corresponding to the HF $2p$ wavefunction and to the corrected $2p$ wavefunction, respectively; \dashddot , direct calculation using the HF wavefunctions of the $2p$, intermediate and final states and experimental $2p$-energy; \full , same with the $2p$ wavefunction from the Dyson equation; \dotted , $2p$ wavefunction from the Dyson equation and plane waves for the intermediate and final states. Vertical line shows the position of the two-photon detachment threshold. \label{fcs1}}
\caption{Three-photon detachment cross sections of F$^-$ from different calculations and experiment. Present calculations: \chain , analytical adiabatic theory (Gribakin and Kuchiev 1997a,b) with parameters corresponding to the corrected $2p$ wavefunction; \dashddot , direct calculation using the HF wavefunctions of the $2p$, intermediate and final states and experimental $2p$-energy; \full , same with the $2p$ wavefunction from the Dyson equation. Other results: $\protect\fullsqr $, HF calculation of Crance (1987); \dashed , $R$-matrix Floquet approach (van der Hart 1996); $\protect\opensqr $, and $\protect\triangle $ experiment Blondel \etal (1989b) and Kwon \etal (1989), respectively. Vertical line shows the position of the two-photon detachment threshold. \label{fcs2}}
\caption{Effective binding potentials for a) second-order and b) first-order wetting transitions in planar homogeneous systems. The minimum of the potential (\fullcircle) represents the equilibrium configuration. At the wetting temperature (thick line), that configuration has zero energy. Note the activation barrier (\opentriangle) and the existence of metastable states (\opencircle) in the first-order potential.}
\caption[]{Left: The 10-30~MeV maximimum likelihood skymap around the position of Mkn~421 ({\bf $\triangle$}) in local coordinates ($\chi$/$\psi$) for the sum of all Cycle VII data. The contour lines start at a detection significance of 2.5$\sigma$ ($\chi^{2}_{1}$-statistics) with a step of 0.5$\sigma$. The \gray emission is positionally consistent with Mkn~421. Right, comparison of the COMPTEL Cycle VII flux results to the average 1997-1998 HEGRA TeV-spectrum (Aharonian et al. 1999). The solid line shows the energy range (500~GeV to 7~TeV) of the HEGRA measurements, and the dashed line the spectral extrapolation of the reported power-law shape towards lower energies.}
\caption[]{Plots illustrating the enhanced scattering of nearby pulsars due to the Local Bubble and the Loop I Bubble. Ratios of the measured decorrelation bandwidths (\ndmeas) to their values as predicted by the models for the structure of the Local ISM (\ndpred) are plotted against the distance estimates. The measurements of \nd are scaled to 327 MHz.}