\caption{~~~ Communication networks. Data on the World Wide Web from http://www.nd.edu/\symbol{126}networks contains $N=325729$ documents and $K=1090108$ links \protect\cite{barabasi1}, while the Internet database is taken from http://moat.nlanr.net and has $N=6474$ nodes and $K=12572$ links. \label{table2}}
\caption{The mean particle displacement $\delta/\lambda$ vs.\$\lambda=\skl{l}$, cf.\Eq.\(\ref{totaldelta}), shown for the model with $R=2$ and different ES barriers. Symbols represent the result of simulations with $L=1000$ for $p_{es}= 0 (\mbox{\Large$\bullet$}), 0.1 (\blacksquare), 0.2 (\mbox{\large $\blacktriangledown$}), 0.4 (\mbox{\large $\blacktriangle$})$. Averages were performed over 100 runs and standard error bars would be smaller than the symbols, where not shown. In addition, the correlation coefficient $\rho\!=\!(\skl{l_a l_b}\!-\! \skl{l}^2)/(\skl{l^2}\!-\!\skl{l}^2)$ for neighboring terraces $a$ and $b$ is displayed for the case $p_{es}=0.2$; crosses and error bars correspond to $10\cdot\rho$.}
\caption{(a) Sketch of the experimental configuration showing the structural parameters: the stripe width $a$, the thickness $h$, and the distance of the stripe to the middle of the quantum well $d$. The applied magnetic field is $B_a$, the stripe magnetization $\cal{M}$, and the well width $L$. (b) Schematic cross section of the stripe together with the magnetic field lines for magnetization perpendicular and parallel to the $x$ direction. (c) Magnetic field profile corresponding to the stripe with perpendicular (\full) and parallel (\dashed) magnetization. The shaded area is the position of the magnetic stripe.}
\caption{Effective potential for the exciton 1s ground state as a function of the center of mass of the exciton $X$, in case of a magnetic stripe with magnetization (a) perpendicular and (b) parallel to the $X$ direction. In this figure, the quantum well width is $L = 80$ {\AA}, the applied magnetic field $B_a = 0.15$ T, the total spin quantum numbers $m_z = -1$ (\dotted) and $m_z = +1$ (\dashed) for $Q_Y = 0$ $\mu$m$^{-1}$, and $m_z = -1$ (\dashddot), $m_z = +1$ (\chain) for $Q_Y = 5$ $\mu$m$^{-1}$. The corresponding effective mass is also shown (\full).}
\caption{Trapping energy of the exciton ground state as a function of the applied magnetic field $B_a$ for the stripe with magnetization perpendicular to the $X$ direction and well widths (a) $L = 50$ {\AA}, (b) $L = 100$ {\AA}, (c) $L = 150$ {\AA}. The spin numbers $m_z = -1$ (\dashed) and $m_z =+1$ (\full), and $Q_Y = 0$ $\mu$m$^{-1}$.}
\caption{Wave function of the exciton ground state as a function of $X$, for the stripe with magnetization perpendicular to the $X$ direction, with spin quantum numbers (a) $m_z = -1$ and (b) $m_z = +1$. The quantum well width $L = 80$ {\AA}, the wave vector $Q_Y = 0$ $\mu$m$^{-1}$, and the applied magnetic field $B_a = -0.15$ T (\dashed), $B_a = 0$ T (\dotted), and $B_a = 0.15$ T (\full). The inset shows the respective effective potentials.}
\caption{ Long-term \gray\light curve of the blazar 3C~279 at energies above 100~MeV\protect{\citep{Hartman97}}. Large flux variations are visible. The two flaring events in June 1991 and February 1996 are shown in the insets with improved time resolution of 0.5 days and 1 day, respectively. Variability on time scales of 1 day is obvious. \label{fig:3c279_lc}}
\caption{ Upper panel: Quasi-simultaneous broad-band spectrum of 3C~273 \protect\citep{Lichti95}. Several maxima are visible, which point to different emission components and processes (see text). \newline Lower panel: Broad-band spectra of 3C~279 for different times and different \gray\flux states\protect{\citep[from][]{Collmar00}}. Only two emission maxima are visible which are interpreted to be due to two non-thermal emission processes: synchrotron radiation from radio to UV/X-rays and IC emission from UV/X-rays to \grays. The thermal emission components are probably outshone by the dominance of the non-thermal ones. \label{fig:blazars_spec}}
\caption{ Multifrequency data of Mkn~421 for different epochs. The variability at X-rays and TeV \grays\is visible. The 3$\sigma$ sensitivity lines for an observation time of 10$^{6}$ seconds of the INTEGRAL SPI instrument is included. The data, apart from the COMPTEL ones, are from \protect{\citet{Buckley96}}. The COMPTEL data are from \protect{\citet{Collmar99b}}. \label{fig:mkn421}}
\caption{ Sketch (not to scale) of a model for the central part of a radio-loud AGN. Possible emission processes for the leptonic models are indicated. The \grays\are generated by inverse-Compton upscattering of soft photons off relativistiv electrons (inside the jet blobs). The different acronyms refer to different populations of soft photons (ECD: upscattering of photons coming directly from the accretion disk; ECC: upscattering of accretion disk photons isotropized by the broad-line region clouds; SSS: upscattering of self-generated (inside jet) synchrotron photons; RSy: upscattering of synchrotron photons reflected by the broad-line region clouds\protect{\citep{Ghisellini96}}. \label{fig:sketch}}
\caption{ The average X-ray to \gray\spectrum of radio-loud Seyferts from GINGA ($\sim$2 - 20~keV) and OSSE ($>$50~keV) observations of 3 sources each. The GINGA X-ray spectrum is fitted with a power-law incident continuum plus Compton reflection (solid line), and the OSSE hard X-ray spectrum with a single power-law model \protect{\citep{Wozniak98}}. \label{fig:loud_Sys}}
\caption{ Broad-band spectrum of Centaurus~A from X to GeV \gray\energies. The spectral break at hard X-rays ($\sim$150~keV) is evident. To match the EGRET flux a second break is necessary \protect{\citep{Steinle98}}. The 3$\sigma$ sensitivity lines for an observation time of 10$^{6}$ seconds of the INTEGRAL instruments IBIS and SPI are included. \label{fig:cen-a}}
\caption{ Left: The asymptotic generalization error as a function of the width of the reversed wedge $a$ in the limit of $\alpha \rightarrow \infty$, for $\gamma=0$ (\full), $\gamma=0.5$ (\dotted) and $\gamma=1$ (\dashed). We chose $\eta=1$. Right: The corresponding normalized overlap $r=R/\sqrt{Q}$ which gives the generalization error in the left figure. The best possible values for the generalization error and the optimal normalized overlap are shown by thick lines. }
\caption{ Training errors $E_t$ and generalization errors $E_g$ as functions of time, for different values of $\alpha$. In all cases $\eta=1$ and $\gamma=0.5$, with initial conditions $Q_{0}=1$ and $E_{g}(t=0)=0.5$. From the upper left panel to the lower right panel: $a=0.0,~0.5,~1.0$ and $1.5$. In each panel, the upper three solid lines indicate our theoretical results of $E_{g}$, together with the corresponding results of computer simulations: \opensquare ($\alpha=0.5$), \fullsquare ($\alpha=1.0$) and \fullcircle ($\alpha=4.0$). The lower three lines are theoretical results for $E_{t}$, compared to the results of computer simulations, with \opensquare ($\alpha=0.5$), \fullsquare ($\alpha=1.0$) and \fullcircle ($\alpha=4.0$). All simulations are carried out for systems of size $N=5000$.}
\caption{ Color distributions of GCs in 3 mergers and 4 ellipticals, compared with Milky Way. Location of old metal-poor GCs is indicated by arrows. Note color evolution of 2nd-generation GCs from very blue in N\,4038/39 to red in M87. The five right panels show that the color crossover occurs between 0.5~Gyr and 3~Gyr (GC ages given in margin).}
\caption{ Linear ages ({\it left}) and logarithmic ages ({\it right}) of objects formed at epochs 0, 0.5, 1, 2, and 3~Gyr after Big Bang, plotted vs.\redshift$z$ in a $\Lambda$CDM cosmology ($H_0$~= 70, $\Omega_{\rm m}$~= 0.3, $\Omega_{\lambda}$~= 0.7). }
\caption{Inverse Compton \gray longitude distributions for a model with $t_{SNR} = 10^4$ yr and hard electron injection spectrum (index 1.8) at $b=0$ for \gray\energies from 1 MeV (bottom) to 1 TeV (top).}
\caption{\label{fig:reacdiff}Comparing the simulation of a reaction-diffusion model for symme\-trized vs.\asymmetrical density matrices. (\full) exact solution, (\dashed) exact local (4-site) interaction, (\opencircle) simulation, symmetrized density matrix, (\opendiamond) simulation, asymmetrical density matrix ($D=0.1$ in inverse time units, and $\Delta t=1$).}
\caption{\label{fig:rhospec}Spectrum of the reduced system density matrix $\rhosys^{\text{symm}}$ at specific steps $2M$ ($m=64$). (\opencircle) $2M=18$ (trunc.\$10^{-40}$), (\opendiamond) $2M=20$ (trunc.\$10^{-29}$), (\opentriangledown) $2M=60$ (trunc.\$10^{-21}$), (\opensquare) $2M=280$ (trunc.\$10^{-21}$).}
\caption{\label{fig:trialg}Branching-fusing model\protect\cite{Carlon:1999} at the critical point $p=0.8403578$ for different TMRG methods. (\full) conventional method, $m=28$; (\dashed) conventional method, $m=11$; (\opencircle) explicit eigenvectors, $m=8$ (4 sites lookahead); (\opendiamond) explicit eigenvectors, $m=11$ (6 sites lookahead).}
\caption{The diagonal elements of $\G(\lambda)$ and $\G^+(\lambda)$ versus $\lambda$: real (\full) and imaginary part (\dashed) for (a) $\alpha=\frac 12$ and (b) $\alpha = \frac 13$.}
\caption{The extended Green's Function $\left(\G(\lambda)\right)_{m,n}$ (see equation (\ref{eq:gadjext})) for $\alpha=\frac 13$ versus $|m-n|$: $\lambda=1.9$ (\opendiamond) and $\lambda=-3.4$ ($+$) , scaled logarithmically. The lines only serve as a guide to the eye.}
\caption{Evolution of \subcolour{} and $M_{dust}$ with time as predicted by the dusty starburst model (dashed lines). The corresponding values for 4C41.17 are plotted as horizontal solid lines, with the $2\sigma$ error bounds indicated by the shaded region \citep{rgmnpaper,vbs98,mythesis}.}
\caption{\Measured$ \widetilde {M_X^2}$ distributions, for background-corrected data (points), Monte Carlo (solid line), and the three components of the Monte Carlo: $B \rightarrow D \ell \nu $ (dashed), $B \rightarrow D^* \ell \nu $ (dotted), $B \rightarrow X_H \ell \nu $ (shaded). The normalization of each component is derived from a fit to the data. \label{fig:mxave}}
\caption{ \label{fig:q.vs.ratio}Ratio of electrical properties calculated and estimates of the analytical formula as a function of inclusion concentration $q$; (a) $\varepsilon_{\mega}$, (b) $\varepsilon_{\micro}$ and (c) $\sigma$. The dashed (\dashed) and solid (\full) lines represent the bounds of Wiener and Hashin-Shtrikman.}
\caption[]{Probability tree analysis of the three prisoner puzzle with {\color{green} extensions necessary to convert the diagram into a Moore machine.}}
\caption{ Mass of the quenched $\rho$ in units of $r_1$ at $m_\pi r_1=0.807$. The \ttblue squares are the improved Kogut-Susskind action\cite{MILCIMPRHO} and \ttred octagons the conventional Kogut-Susskind action\cite{MILCCONVRHO}. The \ttgreen plusses and fancy crosses are clover-Wilson action\cite{WILSONRHO} and \ttred diamonds are domain wall quarks\cite{COLUMBIARHO}. \label{SCALING_FIG} }
\caption{ The static quark potential with $a \approx 0.13$ fm. The \ttred octagons are the quenched potential and \ttblue diamonds the three flavor potential at $m_s$. The lines are fits to ``Coulomb plus linear plus constant'', and the rulers show the lattice spacings and units of 0.1 fm. \label{POTMATCH_FIG} }
\caption{ $r_0 \sqrt{\sigma}$ as a function of quark mass. The quenched limit is at the right side. The \ttblue octagons are MILC results with three degenerate flavors at $a \approx 0.13$ fm, \ttred squares are two light quarks and one strange quark at $a \approx 0.13$ fm, and the \ttgreen diamond is a two flavor run at 0.13 fm\protect\cite{MILC_POTENTIAL}. The crosses are preliminary results at $a \approx 0.09$ fm. The \ttgreen bursts are CPPACS results with two flavors of Wilson quarks\protect\cite{CPPACS_POTENTIAL} and \ttgreen fancy diamonds are SESAM two-flavor Wilson results\protect\cite{SESAM_POTENTIAL}. Some very new two-flavor Wilson results on smaller lattice (not plotted here) which show a much smaller effect can be found in Ref.~\protect\cite{UKQCD_MATCHED}. \label{R0_FIG} }
\caption{ Squared pion mass divided by quark mass. The \ttblue octagons are quenched $a \approx 0.13$ fm results, \ttgreen diamonds two flavor, and \ttred squares three flavor. The bursts are preliminary quenched and three-flavor results at $a \approx 0.09$ fm. \label{MPISQ_OVER_FIG} }
\caption{ Masses for $0^{++}$ propagators in quenched QCD (\ttblue octagons) and full QCD (\ttred squares). The straight line is a linear fit to the large mass points, intended to represent the mass of a $q \bar q$ state, and the curved line is the mass of a two particle $\pi+\eta$ state. \label{A0_DECAY_FIG} }
\caption{ ``J'' with improved Kogut-Susskind quarks. The \ttblue octagons are quenched values, \ttred squares three flavor and the \ttgreen diamond a two flavor point. The burst is the real world value, and the cross the UKQCD quenched value\protect\cite{UKQCD_J}. The horizontal scale parameterizes the quark mass, with lighter quarks to the right. \label{J_FIG} }
\caption{ ``Edinburgh plot'' for MILC matched quenched and full spectrum calculations at $a \approx 0.13$ fm. The \ttred squares are quenched, \ttblue octagons three flavor, and the \ttgreen diamond two flavor results. The \ttred plusses are quenched points at $a \approx 0.09$ fm. \label{APE_BOTH_FIG} }
\caption[]{Ratios of the measured decorrelation bandwidths (\ndmeas) to their predictions from the various models for the distribution of scattering in the Local ISM (\ndpred) are plotted against the distance estimates. The \nd values are scaled to a common frequency of 327 MHz. The lone unfilled star indicates the measurement of PSR J1744--1134 at its TC93 distance of 166 pc.}
\caption{\label{fig:oc}% (a) Calculated optical conductivity for strong electron-phonon coupling $g/W=0.16$ in the ferromagnetic state at $T=0$ (\full), the paramagnetic state at $T=\Tc$ (\dotted) and the paramagnetic state at $T=1.5\Tc$ (\broken). The plot is for $J=S=\infty$, $n=0.5$ and $a=5${\AA}. (b) optical conductivity of \chem{Nd_{0.7}Sr_{0.3}MnO_3} at different temperatures, reproduced from Kaplan \etal \cite{Ka96}.}
\caption{\label{fig:debye0} Normalized dielectric relaxation of different functions, Debye single relaxation (\full), Cole-Cole with $\alpha=0.6$ and $\alpha=0.8$ (\dotted), Davidson-Cole with $\beta=0.6$ and $\beta=0.8$ (\dashed) and Havriliak-Negami with $(\alpha,\beta)=(0.6,0.8)$ and $(\alpha,\beta)=(0.8,0.6)$ (\longchain). %Time dependence of polarization, $P$, when a constant electric field is applied at $t=\xi$. }
\caption{{\small Plot of $\Gamma/\Gamma_0$ as a function of $1/R$, for fixed values of $m_H$ = 120 (\textcolor{red}{red}), 140 (\textcolor{green}{green}) and 160 GeV (\textcolor{blue}{blue}); the upper three lines are the corresponding SM results.}}
\caption{{\small Plot of $\Gamma/\Gamma_0$ as a function of $1/R$ for $m_H = 127 \: GeV$ (\textcolor{red}{red} curve). The black one is eq. (\ref{exact}), i.e. the $\xi \rightarrow 0$ limit.}}
\caption[a]{Distribution of partition function zeroes. (a) 2D 10-state Potts model and (b) 3D $L_t=4$ SU(3) lattice gauge theory. \begin{picture}(0,0) \put(32,230){\bf (a)} \put(32,74){\bf (b)} \end{picture} \vspace*{-0.3cm} }
\caption{\label{Fig:WFD6q.eps} The nucleon distribution in the deuteron, $n_D(k) ~=~ |\Psi_D(k)|^2$ extracted from the $e-D$ scattering and $Dp \to pX$ stripping data \cite{abl83} [{\bf \color{green}V.G.~Ableev {\it et al.}}, Pis'ma Zh.Eksp.Teor.Fiz. {\bf 37}, 196 (1983)]. The solid and dashed lines correspond to the calculations performed within the impulse approximation. The dash-doted line show the effect of including of the non-nucleon component in the DWF [\cite{lyk93}{\bf \color{green}G.I.~Lykasov}, EPAN {\bf 24}, 59 (1993); \cite{efr88}{\bf \color{green}A.V.~Efremov {\it et al.}}, Sov.J.Nucl.Phys. {\bf 47}, 868 (1988)]. }
\caption{\label{Fig:pD.eps} The invariant spectrum of the backward pions in the deuteron fragmentation reaction via the cumulative variable \cite{sta79} $ {\rm x}_C \sim z = (\pi D)/(p D) > 1 $, calculated in the relativistic impulse approximation with including of the non-nucleon component in the DWF [\cite{ill01}{\bf \color{green}A.Yu.~Illarionov {\it et al.}}, Czech.J.Phys. {\bf 51} (2001), hep-ph/0007358, hep-ph/0012290]; its probability {\color{red} $\alpha_{2(3q)}$ is $2\%$ - $4\%$} (dot-dashed and dashed curves, respectively). The long-dashed and solid lines correspond to the calculation using nonrelativistic DWF and DWF obtained by the minimal relativization scheme (MRS) [\cite{fs}{\bf \color{green}L.L.~Frankfurt and M.I.~Strikman}, Phys.Rep. {\bf 160}, 236 (1988)], respectively. The calculated results are compared with the experimental data from [\cite{bal85}{\bf \color{green}A.M.~Baldin}, Nucl.Phys. {\bf A434}, 695c (1985)] for a the projectile proton momentum of $P_p = 9$~GeV/c. One can see the good description of the experimental data for all cumulative $x_{\cal C}$ \cite{sta79}. }
\caption{\label{Fig:F2.eps} This $x$-dependence of the structure function $F_2^A(x, Q^2)$ at $x > 1$ from the deep-inelastic scattering (DIS). The experimental data are taken from \cite{BCDMS} ({\bf \color{green}BCDMS} muon DIS experiment) and \cite{CCFR} ({\bf \color{green}CCFR E770} neutrino DIS experiment). }