2003

1 — cond-mat/0301234

\caption{{\small C/T between 35 and 37.5 T for single crystal URu}$_{2}% ${\small Si}$_{2}${\small with H}$\parallel${\small c-axis. \Although any peak in 35 T occurs below 2 K, already by 35.6 K a small anomaly is visible in C/T near 3 K which, as discussed in the text, is the appearance of a high field phase. T}$_{order}${\small and }$\Delta${\small C/T}$_{order}% ${\small for this anomaly then continue to increase with increasing field in the field range shown here. \A second anomaly at higher temperatures (\symbol{126}6 K) may be apparent in the 35 T data but is clearly visible in the 35.6 T data. \Data in this temperature range were not taken again until 38.1 T (at which point the small anomaly appears to be absent, see Fig. 3).\This anomaly may correspond to a second high field anomaly bounded by the two lower dashed lines shown in Fig. 4 corresponding to the two lower metamagnetic transitions at 35.8 and 37.3 T.}}

2 — hep-lat/0301024

\caption{$aM_{1^{-+}}$ {\em vs.} $D_{\rm min}$ for $10/g^2=8.40$ quenched lattices $am_{\rm valence}=0.040$. The \tmpred octagons are four parameter fits, with one mass and amplitude of each parity, and the \tmpblue squares are five parameter fits with one $1^{++}$ mass fixed to the $a_1$ mass, as described in the text. All these fits used a maximum distance $D_{\rm max}=15$. The four parameter fit points are shifted slightly to the right for clarity. The symbol size is proportional to the confidence level of the fit, with the symbol size in the labels corresponding to 50\%. \label{fits_b840m040_fig}}

\caption{Vector meson (``$V$'') and octet baryon (``$B$'') masses in units of $r_1$, which is defined from the static quark potential by $r_1^2 F(r_1) = 1.0$. This graph contains points from quenched simulations with $a \approx 0.13$ fm (\tmpblue octagons) and 0.09 fm (\tmpblue crosses), and from simulations with three flavors of dynamical quarks (two light and one strange quark) at $a \approx 0.13$ fm (\tmpred squares) and 0.09 fm (\tmpred bursts). The \tmpgreen diamond is from a two flavor simulation with $a \approx 0.13$ fm. Points above the dashed line are baryon masses, and those below the dashed line vector meson masses. \label{mhadron_r1_fig}}

3 — cond-mat/0302002

\caption{\sf The energy values of decoys and native proteins in the {\sc 4state\_reduced} set by nonlinear design potentials and their correlation with the rmsd values to the native structures. }

\caption{\sf Results of discrimination of native structures from decoys using nonlinear kernel potentials. The decoy sets include the {\sc 4state\_reduced} set, the {\sc Lattice\_ssfit} set, and the {\sc lmsd} set \cite{SamudralaLevitt00_PS}. The energy rank of the native structure and its $z$-score are listed. The correlation coefficient $R$ is also listed in parenthesis for the {\sc 4state\_reduced} set. KFP stands for kernel folding potential, and KDP stands for kernel design potential. TE-13 potential is linear distance based potential optimized by linear programming, taken as reported in \cite{TobiElber00_Proteins}, and MJ potential is statistical potential as reported in \cite{Miyazawa96_JMB}. Results for TE-13 potential and Miyazawa-Jernigan potential are taken from Table II of \cite{TobiElber00_Proteins}. }

4 — cond-mat/0302039

\caption{\label{fig:tetrahedra}A chain of edge-sharing tetrahedra, a one-dimensional example of the class of geometry considered in this article. The inter-pair hopping (\full) is, in general, not the same strength as the intra-pair hopping (\dashed).}

\caption{\label{fig:onedbinding} The energy \emph{per hole} of various states as a function of the model parameter $\lambda$. Whether we are considering the linear chain, square, or cubic superlattice, the one-hole ferromagnetic Nagaoka state (\chain) and one-hole low-spin state (\dashed) are degenerate at $\lambdac^{(1)}=1/2$. The two-hole bound-pair low-spin state on the linear chain (\full) is degenerate with the two-hole Nagaoka state at $\lambdac^{(2)}=0.4809(6)$. The binding energy of the two-hole low-spin state on the square superlattice (\dotted) is an order of magnitude smaller than the linear chain case; in both 1-d and 2-d the binding energy vanishes at $\lambda=1$.}

5 — cond-mat/0303191

\caption[]{% The width $\mathit{\Gamma}$ of the disorder broadened lowest Harper band vs. disorder strength $W$ for different Gaussian correlation lengths $\eta=0.3$ ($\Diamond$), $0.7$ (\raisebox{-.3ex}{\Large$\circ$}), $1.0$ ({\scriptsize$\triangle$}), and $2.0$ (\pentagon). The solid lines are linear fits $\mathit{\Gamma}\propto W$. }

6 — hep-ph/0303157

\caption{\label{fig:fig_N1} N=1; legend: \textcolor{red}{BVA} (solid) , \textcolor{blue}{2PI-1N} (dashed), and \textcolor{green}{Hartree} (dotted)}

7 — nlin/0303056

\caption{Study area in the Santa Maria Basin with the locality of annual layered lake deposits in the locality El Paso, the relative precipitation anomaly during the El Ni\~no 1965/66 compared to mean annual precipitation\citep[annual precipitation as a mean from July to June; data from][]{bianchi92} and the prevailing wind directions during January \citep[black arrows; wind directions from][]{prohaska76}.}

\caption{Cross recurrence plot of SOI vs.~precipitation data from the city of Salta (SAL). The $x$-axis shows the time along the phase space trajectory of the SOI and the $y$-axis that of SAL. Black points represent the occurrence of similar states in both \textcolor{red}{processes}. Diagonal lines correspond with epochs of similar dynamics in both \textcolor{red}{processes}. The amount and length of these lines can be used as measures of the similarity of both \textcolor{red}{processes}. }

8 — astro-ph/0304527

\caption{The spectral energy distribution (SED) of the extragalactic infrared background\protect\cite{ds02}. The data are given along with the two semi- empirical model SEDs. The point at 100\mic\indicated by the small square derived in Ref.\protect\cite{la00} is less certain than the data at lower frequencies because isotropy was not established for this point.}

\caption{The observed \gray\spectrum of the Crab nebula with curves showing the synchrotron and Compton components (from Ref.\protect\cite{de96}).}

9 — cond-mat/0304028

\caption[]{(a) Density profiles for (\textcolor{blue}{$\triangle$}) $N_f = 30$, $U=6t$ and $V_2=15t$, (\textcolor{green}{$\bigcirc$}) $N_f = 70$, $U=6t$ and $V_2=6.25t$, and (\textcolor{red}{$\bigtriangledown$}) $N_f = 74$, $U=6t$ and $V_2=7t$. (b) Variance of the local density (c) Local compressibility $\kappa^l$ as defined in eq.\(\ref{localc}).}

\caption[]{The local compressibility $\kappa^l$ {\em vs.} $\delta=1-n$ at $\delta \rightarrow 0$ for (\textcolor{blue}{$\triangle$}) $N_f = 70$, $U=8t$ and $V_2=6.25t$; (\textcolor{red}{$\bigtriangledown$}) $N_f = 70$, $U=6t$ and $V_2=6.25t$; (\textcolor{green}{$\bigcirc$}) $N_f=72$, $U=6 t$ and a quartic potential with $V_4=6.25t$; (\textcolor{cyan}{$\Diamond$}) unconfined periodic system with $U=6t$. Inset: Dependence of the critical exponent $\varpi$ on $\Delta \tau^2$.}

\caption[]{a) Variance $\Delta$ {\em vs.} $n$ for (\textcolor{green}{$\bigcirc$}) harmonic potential $V_2=6.25 t$ with $N=100$; (\textcolor{blue}{$\triangle$}) quartic potential $V_4=15.82 t$ with $N=150$; (\textcolor{red}{$\bigtriangledown$}) harmonic potential $V_2=10 t$ + cubic $V_3 = 2.5 t$ + quartic $V_4 = 7.5 t$ with $N=50$; and (full line) unconfined periodic potential with $N=102$ sites. The curves correspond from top to bottom to $U/t = 0, 2, 4, 8$. For a discussion of the insets, see text.}

\caption[]{Phase diagram for a system with $N=100$ (\textcolor{red}{$\bigtriangledown$}) and $N = 150$ (\textcolor{green}{$\bigcirc$}) sites. The phases are explained in the text.}

10 — cond-mat/0305289

\caption{\label{fig:epsart} The differential conductance, dI/dV, versus $V_{SD}$ for different inter-dot coupling strength tuned via V5 gate. (a) From top to bottom: V5= -0.6155, -0.616, -0.6165, -0.617, -0.6175, -0.618, -0.6185, -0.619, -0.6195, -0.62V, second cool-down. (b) From top to bottom: V5= -0.5965, -0.5970, -0.5975, -0.5978, -0.5982, -0.5987, -0.5990, -0.5992, -0.5995V, first cool-down, offset by 0.005e2/h for each trace. (c) From top to bottom: V5=-0.5925, -0.5928, -0.5931, -0.5934, -0.5937, -0.5940, -0.5943, -0.5946, -0.5949, -0.5952, -0.5955, -0.5958, -0.5961, -0.5964, -0.5967, -0.5970, -0.5973, -0.5976, -0.5980, -0.5983, -0.5986V, third cool-down as measured in Kondo valley 2 of Fig. 2(b), offset by %$0.02e^2/h$ for each trace. (d) Selected data from (c) without offset. $0.02e^2/h$ for each trace. The traces vary in different cool-downs due to the rearrangement in the occupation of charged in defects and traps. (d) Selected data from (c) without offset. %Notice the distinct behaviors of dI/dV in the different quantum regimes. Bottom half shows first quantum state regime (from top to bottom: V5=-0.5961, -0.5964, -0.5970, -0.5986). The upper half shows the second regime (from top to bottom: V5=-0.5946, -0.5940, -0.5937, -0.5934). (e) ZBA peak amplitude $g=dI/dV|_{V=0}$, peak splitting $\delta V$ and width W extracted by first subtracting three types of %background signals followed by a two-Gaussian fit. The simulated background signals followed by a two-Gaussian fit. The fit and data are virtually indistinguishable. The simulated backgrounds are \textcolor{red}{$\bullet$}; two exponential functions + constant (e.g. marked by the two gray dash lines for the bottom trace in (c) and combined functions shown as gray dot line); \textcolor{blue}{$\blacktriangle$} two Boltzmann and $\blacksquare$ linear function. The bottom figure shows the two peak widths obtained after the subtraction of a two exponential background. %The double peak %feature visibly disappears for V5 $<$ -0.594V, marked by the dash line. Results for a single Gaussian fit (V5 $<$ -0.594V only) are indicated by open-circles ($\circ$). Typically, the fitting error is smaller than the symbol. %In this regime aside from the slight asymmetry of the single %ZBA peak, a single-Gaussian can fit as well as two Gaussians within %statistical error indicating that the double peaks are merging into one. } }

11 — cond-mat/0305680

\caption{\label{fig:fig2} Top, temperature dependence of $\nu_3$ dimer--dimer splitting $\omega(\nu_3(A_g+B_{1g}))-\omega(\nu_3(B_{2g}+B_{3g}))$. Bottom, temperature dependence of $\nu_3(A_g+B_{1g})$ linewidth. All data are taken for the same d[2,2] crystal. Laser polarisation is $\mathbf{c}$. Squares '$\Box$' show slow cooling (see text); crosses '\textcolor{blue}{+}' show fast cooling, 50 $\mu$W laser power; circles '{\large\textcolor{red}{$\bullet$}}' show fast cooling, 15 $\mu$W laser power. Curves are a guide to the eye.}

\caption{\label{fig:fig3} Temperature dependence of $\delta(\nu_2,\bm{c})$. d[0,0], the low-frequency component (up triangles, \textcolor{magenta}{$\triangle$}); d[0,0], the high-frequency component (down triangles, \textcolor{royal}{$\bigtriangledown$}; d[4,4] (squares, $\blacksquare$); d[3,3] (solid diamonds, \textcolor{blue}{$\blacklozenge$}, for the fast cooling; open diamonds, \textcolor{red}{$\diamondsuit$}, for the slow cooling; crosses, +, for the unfinished slow cooling). Lines are a guide to the eye.}

\caption{\label{fig:fig4} Temperature dependence of $\delta(\nu_3(A_g+B_{1g}),\bm{b})$. d[0,0], the low-frequency component (up triangles, \textcolor{magenta}{$\triangle$}); d[0,0], the high-frequency component (down triangles, \textcolor{royal}{$\bigtriangledown$}; d[4,4] (squares, $\blacksquare$); d[3,3] (solid diamonds, \textcolor{blue}{$\blacklozenge$}, for the fast cooling; open diamonds, \textcolor{red}{$\diamondsuit$}, for the slow cooling; crosses, +, for the unfinished slow cooling). Lines are a guide to the eye.}

\caption{\label{fig:fig8} Temperature dependence of the dimer--dimer EMV splitting of $\nu_3$ for d[3.3] after "slow" cooling (open diamonds, \textcolor{red}{$\diamondsuit$}), "fast" cooling (solid diamonds, \textcolor{blue}{$\blacklozenge$}), and above 50 K (crosses, +). The results for d[4,4] are also shown (crosses, \textcolor{magenta}{$\times$}). Lines are a guide to the eye. Polarization $\bm{c}$.}

\caption{\label{fig:fig9} Correlations between $\delta(\nu_2,\bm{c},3)$, and $\omega(\nu_3(A_g+B_{1g}))-\omega(\nu_3(B_{2g}+B_{3g}))$ Temperature is 5 K. Open (\textcolor{red}{$\diamondsuit$}) and solid (\textcolor{blue}{$\blacklozenge$}) diamonds designate the data after "slow" and "fast" cooling respectively, crosses (+) show the data obtained after different cooling procedures that are neither "slow" nor "fast".}

12 — quant-ph/0305184

\caption{\label{fig:contrastplot} Contrast of the interference pattern as a function of interaction induced phase, $\phi_{int}(v_0)$. With no dispersion compensation ({\color{ggray}$\blacktriangle$}) contrast peaks near \mbox{$\phi_{int}(v_0)=0$}. Using the time-dependent phase shifters, contrast revives at \mbox{$\phi_{int}(v_0)=62$~rad} for a ramp frequency $f=17$~kHz ({\color{dgray}$\bullet$}), and at \mbox{$\phi_{int}(v_0)=144$~rad} for $f=40$~kHz ($\blacksquare$).}

13 — math/0306278

\caption{Quantum corral in the shape of the Bunimovich stadium. Courtesy of IBM{\tiny\textregistered} Research.}

14 — astro-ph/0307400

\caption{\footnotesize \baselineskip 8pt 1-D cuts at x/R = 0.11 (\Red{solid line}), 0.22 (\Yellow{short dash line}) 0.33 (\Green{dot-short dash line}), 0.44 (\Cyan{long dash line}), 0.55 (\Blue{dot-long dash line}), 0.66 (\Magenta{short \& long dash line}), 0.77 (dotted line), \& 0.88 (solid line). Here we look downstream and$z$ is into the page. \label{fig2}}

15 — cond-mat/0307173

\caption{Overlap $A^1/N$ in the stationary state as a function of initial overlap at $t=0$ in the retrieval phase ($\alpha=0.05$ and $g=0.1$) for $\eta=0$ ($\blacklozenge$ and $\blacktriangle$) and $1$ (\opencircle and \opensquare). Two system sizes ($p=64$ and $128$) are shown in order to appreciate finite size effects. Inset: Overlap as a function of $\alpha$ for $\eta=0$ (\opencircle, $*$ and \opendiamond) and $\eta=1$ ($+$ and $\times$) for maximal initial overlap. The stable (solid line) and unstable (dashed) solutions of saddle point equations are also shown.}

16 — astro-ph/0308146

\caption[]{Example of the stellar template subtraction method for the \blue\spectra. The spectrum at the top shows the original spectrum (solid line) and best fit using a library of absorption-line template spectra (dotted line). At the bottom, the residual spectrum (solid line) and the corresponding\NI\lda5200 line fit (dotted line) is presented. Flux unit is \ergcmsaa.}

\caption[]{Similar plots as in Fig.~\ref{fig:NIfit}, now for the \red\spectra. Two examples are shown, each time with the original spectrum (solid lines, top) and their respective fit (dotted lines, top), as well as the residual spectra (solid lines, bottom) and the Gaussian fit to the emission lines (dotted line, bottom). Flux unit is\ergcmsaa.}

\caption[]{{\it HST}/WFPC2 images of the central 6$\times$6 arcsec$^2$ of NGC~2974. with a resolution of $\sim$\,0\farcs1 ($\cor 10.4\;$\dist~ pc), except for the \Ha+\NII\image in{\sf (d)} which has resolution $\sim$\,0\farcs13. The orientation on the sky is indicated in panel {\sf (d)}. {\sf (a)} The F547M (5454~\AA) image, and {\sf (b)} the F814W (8269~\AA) image. The greyscales in both {\sf (a)} and {\sf (b)} use a logarithmic stretch. Darker shades represent brighter regions. {\sf (c)} The $V\!-\!I$ colour map, obtained from the ratio of {\sf (a)} to {\sf (b)} as explained in Sect.~\ref{sec:HSTimaging}. The greyscales range linearly from of 0.84 to 1.64 mag in $V\!-\!I$. Darker shades represent redder colours. {\sf (d)} The H$\alpha$+\NII\image. The greyscales (in units of erg cm$^{-2}$ s$^{-1}$ arcsec$^{-2}$) range logarithmically from $2.0 \times 10^{-15}$ to $4.0 \times 10^{-13}$, while the peak intensity is $9.6 \times 10^{-13}$. Darker shades represent brighter regions. }

\caption[]{Comparison between the \tiger\stellar kinematics (solid lines) for NGC~2974 with published data. Velocity$V$ is shown in the left panels, and dispersion $\sigma$ in the right panels. Open squares are from CvdM94, and filled squares are from BSG94. Velocities are relative to the systemic velocity of NGC~2974.}

\caption[]{Comparison between the \tiger\gas kinematics (solid line;$V_g$ only) and the published long-slit kinematics (open squares) presented by Zeilinger et al.\(1996). }

\caption[]{\mgb\line strength maps before (left panel) and after (right panel) correction for the[NI]\lda5200 emission line. Surface brightness contours from the \blue\\tiger\data (cf.\Fig.~\ref{fig:IVSmap}) are overplotted}

\caption[]{Flux map of the [NII]\lda6583 emission line derived from the \red\\tiger\datacube. Spectra (solid lines) and their corresponding multi-Gaussian fits (dashed lines) are shown in various places over the field. Note that all flux scales are the same, except for the central spectrum shown in the central top panel. Flux unit is$10^{-16}$~\ergcmsa\for the spectra.}

\caption[]{Gas velocity (left) and velocity dispersion (right) maps for the emission lines in the \red\datacube. The isovelocity contours have a step of 50\kms. The isocontours superimposed on the dispersion map correspond to the \NII\lda6583 flux map (step of 10$^{-15}$~\ergcmsa).}

\caption[]{Comparison between our $f(E,L_z)$ model and the \tiger\stellar kinematics. Top: observed (left) and modeled velocity fields. Bottom: major (solid lines) and minor (dashed lines) axis velocity (left) and dispersion (right) profiles. The thick lines correspond to the model, the thin lines to the observed kinematics. The minor-axis dispersion profile has been shifted for clarity. Note the slight minor-axis velocity gradient, which is not reproduced by the axisymmetric model.}

17 — astro-ph/0309010

\caption{Inelastic proton-air cross-sections versus primary energy. The lines represent calculated cross-sections for three different versions of the model QGSJET~01, model~1 (original QGSJET) (\full), model~2~(\dotted), and model~3 (\dashed). For comparison, cross-sections of interaction models implemented in CORSIKA (left-hand graph) and other models (right-hand graph) are shown, for references see text. }

\caption{Average depth of the shower maximum versus primary energy. Results are shown from the experiments BLANCA (Fowler \etal 2001), CACTI (Paling \etal 1997), DICE (Swordy \etal 2000), Fly's Eye (Bird \etal 1994), Haverah Park (Watson 2000), HEGRA (Arqueros \etal 2000), HiRes/MIA (Abu-Zayyad \etal 2000), Mt. Lian Wang (Cha \etal 2001), SPASE/VULCAN (Dickinson \etal 1999), and Yakutsk (Dyakonov \etal 1993, Knurenko \etal 2001). The data are compared with results from CORSIKA simulations for primary protons and iron nuclei using different versions of QGSJET: model~1 (original QGSJET) (\full), model~2 (\dotted), model~3 (\chain), and model~3a (\dashed). }

\caption{Mean logarithmic mass $\lna$ of primary cosmic rays versus their energy calculated from experimental \Xmax\values from air shower observations (see\fref{xmax}) with the results of CORSIKA/QGSJET simulations for two different sets of inelastic hadronic cross-sections, model~1 (top) and model~2 (bottom). Results of direct measurements from JACEE (Shibata 1999) and RUNJOB (Apanasenko \etal 2001) are shown as well. The lines represent calculations according to the \modell: galactic component only (\full), plus \adhoc component of solely protons (\dashed).}

18 — astro-ph/0309654

\caption{The phase-averaged epoch folding results for the first 1780 days (from JD 2448370) of the \BATSE data: compare this plot with the figure~1b in \citet{Konig97}, where \redchisq at $P_i$ is not always larger than that at $P_{i+1}$ due to the noise fluctuations. One can also notice a broad peak around 27.6 days, which is the second harmonics of the 13.8 day period. }

\caption{The detailed view of epoch folding \redchisq from the \BATSE data: $P_2$ (a) and $P_3$ (b) region from all the data (3321 days from JD 2448370.0), $P_3$ region from the first 1780 days (c) and from the next 1541 days (d) of the data. }

\caption{The detailed view of epoch folding \redchisq from the \ASM data: $P_2$ (a) and $P_3$ (b) region from all the data (2221 days from JD 2450088.6), and the same from the first 573 days (c,d) of the data}

\caption{Stability of X-ray binaries to radiation-driven warping ($\alpha = 0.3$ and $\epsilon = 0.1$), taken from \citet{Ogilvie01}. The lines represent the low boundary values of $r_b$ for the instability condition for a given $q$, depending on the bending modes. Two estimates for \4u1700 in the text are marked with an X. HMXRBs are shown with circles, soft X-ray transients with diamonds, other low mass X-ray binaries as squares. Black hole candidates appear as open symbols and neutron star primaries as solid symbols. Crosses represent systems for which a long term period has been reported. See Table~1 in\citet{Ogilvie01} for the list of the binaries in this figure.}

19 — cond-mat/0309601

\caption{ \label{NT_Ni}Time evolution of (a) total number of atoms $\tilde N$ and (b) temperature $T$ for several initial conditions of evaporative cooling: the initial number of trapped atoms $N_i$ is varied from $1.5 \times 10^8$ to $3 \times 10^9$ under the fixed initial temperature of $T_i=380 \ \mu$K. In both figures, the curves correspond to cases with $N_i=1.5 \times 10^8$ ({\unitlength 1pt \thicklines \put(0,3){\line(1,0){8}} \multiput(10,3)(4,0){3}{\line(1,0){2}} \put(22,3){\line(1,0){8}}}\hspace{30pt}), $2 \times 10^8$ ({\unitlength 1pt \thicklines \put(0,3){\line(1,0){7}} \multiput(9,3)(4,0){2}{\line(1,0){2}} \put(17,3){\line(1,0){7}} }\hspace{24pt}), $3 \times 10^8$ ({\unitlength 1pt \thicklines \put(0,3){\line(1,0){8}} \multiput(10,3)(4,0){1}{\line(1,0){2}} \put(14,3){\line(1,0){8}} }\hspace{22pt}), $5 \times 10^8$ ({\unitlength 1pt \thicklines \multiput(0,3)(7,0){3}{\line(1,0){3.5}} %\put(21,3){\line(1,0){1}} }\hspace{20pt}), $1 \times 10^9$ ({\unitlength 1pt \thicklines \multiput(0,3)(2,0){10}{\line(1,0){1}} }\hspace{20pt}), and $3 \times 10^9$ ({\unitlength 1pt \thicklines \put(0,3){\line(1,0){20}} }\hspace{20pt}).}

\caption{\small \label{rate} Time evolution of (a) evaporation rate $\dot N_{\rm ev}$, (b) spill rate $\dot N_{\rm spill}$, (c) loss rate due to two-body dipolar relaxation $\dot N_2$, and (d) loss rate due to three-body recombination $\dot N_3$. We use the same lines as in Fig.\\ref{NT_Ni} in terms of the corresponding $N_i$ values, and show the results for the cases of $N_i=5 \times 10^8$ ({\unitlength 1pt \thicklines \multiput(0,3)(7,0){3}{\line(1,0){3.5}} %\put(21,3){\line(1,0){1}} }\hspace{20pt}), $1 \times 10^9$ ({\unitlength 1pt \thicklines \multiput(0,3)(2,0){10}{\line(1,0){1}} }\hspace{20pt}), and $3 \times 10^9$ ({\unitlength 1pt \thicklines \put(0,3){\line(1,0){20}} }\hspace{20pt}). The symbols in the figures correspond to the same points plotted on the cooling trajectories in Fig.\\ref{trajectory}}

\caption{\small \label{NT_Ti}Time evolution of (a) total number of atoms $\tilde N$ and (b) temperature $T$ for several initial conditions of evaporative cooling: the initial temperature $T_i$ is varied under a fixed initial number of atoms $N_i\simeq5 \times 10^8$. In both figures, the curves correspond to the cases with $T_i=630\ \mu$K ({\unitlength 1pt \thicklines \put(0,3){\line(1,0){7}} \multiput(9,3)(4,0){2}{\line(1,0){2}} \put(17,3){\line(1,0){7}} }\hspace{24pt}), $580\ \mu$K ({\unitlength 1pt \thicklines \put(0,3){\line(1,0){8}} \multiput(10,3)(4,0){1}{\line(1,0){2}} \put(14,3){\line(1,0){8}} }\hspace{22pt}), $480\ \mu$K ({\unitlength 1pt \thicklines \multiput(0,3)(7,0){3}{\line(1,0){3.5}} %\put(21,3){\line(1,0){1}} }\hspace{20pt}), $380\ \mu$K ({\unitlength 1pt \thicklines \multiput(0,3)(2,0){10}{\line(1,0){1}} }\hspace{20pt}), and $280\ \mu$K ({\unitlength 1pt \thicklines \put(0,3){\line(1,0){20}} }\hspace{20pt}).}

20 — cond-mat/0309670

\caption{(Color online) Four density profiles (\textcolor{blue}{$\triangle$}) (cuts across Fig.\\ref{perfil3D}) and their variances (\textcolor{green}{$\bigcirc$}). The fillings are $N_f=$50 (a), 68 (b), 94 (c), and 150 (d).}

\caption{(Color online) Profiles for a trap with $Va^2=0.0025t$ and $N_f=70$, the on-site repulsions are $U/t=$2 (\textcolor{blue}{$\triangle$}), 4 (\textcolor{red}{$\bigtriangledown$}), 6 (\textcolor{cyan}{\large $\Diamond$}), and 8 (\textcolor{green}{$\bigcirc$}). (a) Local density, (b) variance of the local density, (c) local compressibility $\kappa^\ell$ as defined in Eq.\(\ref{localc}). The dashed lines in (b) are the values of the variance in the $n=1$ homogeneous system for $U/t=2, \ 4,\ 6,\ 8$ (from top to bottom).}

\caption{(Color online) Local compressibility as a function of $\ell$ for the homogeneous and trapped ($Va^2=0.0025t$, $N_f=70$) systems in the Mott-insulating and metallic phases, $U=6t$. (\textcolor{red}{$\bigtriangledown$}) $n=1$ homogeneous, (\textcolor{green}{$\bigcirc$}) $n_{i=0}=1$ trapped, (\textcolor{blue}{$\triangle$}) $n = 0.66$ homogeneous, and (\textcolor{cyan}{\large $\Diamond$}) $n_{i=-32} \sim 0.66$ trapped. }

\caption{(Color online) Density-density correlations for a homogeneous system with $N=102$ at half filling for $U=6t$. MF (\textcolor{blue}{$\triangle$}) and QMC (\textcolor{red}{$\bigtriangledown$}) solutions.}

\caption{(Color online) MF profiles for a trap with $N=100$, $Va^2=0.0025t$, and $N_f=70$, the on-site repulsions are $U/t=2$ (\textcolor{blue}{$\triangle$}), 3 (\textcolor{red}{$\bigtriangledown$}), 4 (\textcolor{cyan}{\large $\Diamond$}), and 6 (\textcolor{green}{$\bigcirc$}). (a) Local density, (b) variance of the local density. The dashed lines in (b) are the MF values of the variance in the $n=1$ homogeneous system for $U/t=2, \ 3,\ 4,\ 6$ (from top to bottom).}

\caption{(Color online) MF local compressibility as a function of $\ell$ for the homogeneous and trapped ($Va^2=0.0025t$, $N_f=70$) systems for $n=1$ and $n \sim 0.66$, $U=6t$. (\textcolor{red}{$\bigtriangledown$}) $n=1$ homogeneous, (\textcolor{green}{$\bigcirc$}) $n_{i=0}=1$ trapped, (\textcolor{blue}{$\triangle$}) $n \sim 0.66$ homogeneous, and (\textcolor{cyan}{\large $\Diamond$}) $n_{i=-30}\sim 0.66$ trapped. }

\caption{(Color online) MF normalized momentum distribution function (\textcolor{green}{$\bigcirc$}) (a)-(d), and their corresponding density (\textcolor{blue}{$\triangle$}) and $\langle S^z \rangle$ (\textcolor{red}{$\bigtriangledown$}) profiles (e)-(h) for $U/t=2$ (a),(e), 3 (b),(f), 4 (c),(g), 6 (d),(h) and $N=100$, $N_f=70$, $Va^2=0.0025t$.}

\caption{(Color online) Phase diagram for systems with $Va^2=0.006 t, \ N=100$ (\textcolor{red}{$\bigtriangledown$}) and $Va^2=0.002t, \ N = 150$ (\textcolor{green}{$\bigcirc$}). The different phases are explained in the text.}

\caption{(Color online) Profiles for a trap with $Va^2=0.006t$ and $N_f=30$, the on-site repulsions are $U/t=2$ (\textcolor{blue}{$\triangle$}), 4 (\textcolor{red}{$\bigtriangledown$}), 6 (\textcolor{cyan}{$\Diamond$}), and 8 (\textcolor{green}{$\bigcirc$}). (a) Local density, (b) variance of the local density.}

\caption{(Color online) Phase diagram for systems with $V_4a^4=3 \times 10^{-6}t, \ N=100$ (\textcolor{red}{$\bigtriangledown$}) and $V_4a^4=10^{-6} t, \ N = 100$ (\textcolor{green}{$\bigcirc$}). The phases are labeled in the same way as in Fig.\\ref{DFS_ScalingF}.}

21 — gr-qc/0310042

\caption{Schematic for the prolongation scheme, in $1+1$ dimensions, for a two-grid hierarchy. The large filled \ifcolour(red) \fi circles represent data on the coarse grid, and smaller filled \ifcolour(green) \fi circles represent data on the fine grid. The arrows indicate interpolation of coarse grid data in space and time, necessary for the boundary conditions on the fine grid (explained in section \ref{sec:boundary-prolongation}).}

\caption{Schematic for the time evolution scheme, in $1+1$ dimensions, for a two-grid hierarchy. The large filled \ifcolour(red) \fi circles represent data on the coarse grid, and smaller filled \ifcolour(green) \fi circles represent data on the fine grid. The algorithm uses the following order. 1: Coarse grid time step, 2 and 3: fine grid time steps, 4: restriction from fine grid to coarse grid. Since the fine grid is always nested inside a coarse grid, there are also coarse grid points (not shown) spanning the fine grid region (at times when the coarse grid is defined) at the locations of ``every other'' fine grid point; the data at these coarse grid points are restricted (copied directly) from the fine grid data.}

\caption{Schematic for initial data scheme, in $1+1$ dimensions. Our use of quadratic interpolation in time requires three time levels of coarse grid data in order to provide boundary data for evolution on fine grids. To achieve this from the beginning of the evolution (without the use of a known continuum solution with which to ``pre-load'' these levels), we evolve our initial data (defined at $t=0$) both forwards and \emph{backwards} one step in time. In this way, three time levels of coarse grid data are always available to provide boundary data along the edges of fine grids. The data at various times are denoted by fractions of the time step $\Delta t^0$ on the base grid. The coarsest grid is shown as by a solid \ifcolour(red) \fi line, a finer grid by a long-dashed \ifcolour(green) \fi line, and a still finer grid by a dotted \ifcolour(blue) \fi line. (We perform some additional backwards evolution as well, which we describe in the main text. The essence of the scheme, however, is given here.)}

22 — astro-ph/0311134

\caption{Top row diagram shows cuts for the C50 jet at t=3.35 seconds for the jet close to the base (6.5 x 10$^{8}$ cm) and for the jet close to the head (1.3 x 10$^{10}$ cm). Cuts are for the angles 0.25$^{\circ}$, 1.125$^{\circ}$, 2.25$^{\circ}$ and 3.25$^{\circ}$ (\textcolor{red}{solid}, \textcolor{green}{long dash}, \textcolor{cyan}{short dash} and \textcolor{blue}{dash-dot} correspondingly). On the bottom row diagrams show the fundamental (\textcolor{red}{SO}), 1st, 2nd, and 3rd pinch body modes (\textcolor{green}{B1}, \textcolor{blue}{B2}, \textcolor{magenta}{B3}). These are the real and imaginary solutions for these regions.}

23 — cond-mat/0311652

\caption{Contour plot of the magnetic scattering near $\mathbf{Q}=(1,0,0)$ in \caruoeda\at T=12\,K and at an energy transfer of 4.1\,meV ((a) is a simulation and (b) the measured data). Due to the enhanced background contribution at lower scattering angles the scans were restricted to$Q$-values larger than 1.66\,\AA$^{-1}$. For clarity the background has been subtracted and the data has been corrected for the magnetic form factor of \chemical{Ru^{+}}. The schematic representation in (a) assumes four peaks at $(1\pm0.22,0,0)$ and at $(1,\pm0.22,0)$ with Gaussian profiles and the experimentally determined parameters, see text.}

\caption{Constant-energy scans performed at different energy transfers around $\mathbf{Q}=(1,0,0)$ along the $[0,1,0]$ direction at T=1.5\,K. The scattering angle dependent background was subtracted for clarity. The horizontal bars indicate the spectrometer resolution. The solid lines are fits to Gaussian functions. The data were acquired with monitor 1E7, which corresponds to a counting time of approximately 7\,min at 4.1\,meV.}

\caption{(a) Comparison of the inelastic signal around $\mathbf{Q}=(1,0,0)$ in \casrruo\for x=2.0 (\protect\includegraphics*[width=0.8em]{triangle_black}), 0.62 (\protect\includegraphics*[width=0.8em]{circle_open}), and 0.52 (\protect\includegraphics*[width=0.8em]{circle_black}) at an energy transfer of 4.1\,meV (x=2.0 and 0.62) and 2.1\,meV (x=0.52). Data was normalized with a reference phonon scan and background scattering has been subtracted. The data for the pure compound (x=2.0) was taken from Ref.~\cite{Braden03}. Inset : sketch of the calculated Fermi surfaces of the $\gamma$ sheet, indicating the influence of the downward shift of the $d_{xy}$ band due to the rotation of the octahedra.}

24 — hep-ph/0311211

\caption{\blue \label{tab:table1}Total $\gamma \gamma $ cross-sections and required precision for models based on factorization}

\caption{\blue \label{tab:table2} For Eikonal Minijet Models}

25 — cond-mat/0312453

\caption{Density profiles of the stalk-like structures shown in the $r,z$ plane of cylindrical coordinates. As the structures are axially symmetric, the figure and its reflection about the $z$ axis are shown for the viewer's convenience. The amphiphiles contain a fraction $f=0.35$ of the hydrophilic component. The bilayers are under zero tension. Only the majority component is shown at each point: solvent segments are white, hydrophilic and hydrophobic segments of the amphiphile are dark and light correspondingly. \protect\highlight{Distances are measured in units of the polymer radius of gyration, $R_g$, which is the same for both the amphiphiles and for the homopolymer solvent.} (a) Two bilayers in solvent. There is no stalk between them. \protect\highlight{Their thickness, $d$, defined in the text, Eq. (\ref{thickness}) is shown.} (b) Unstable transition state to the formation of the initial stalk, a state we label $S_0$. The radius of the stalk is $R=0.6R_g$. In general the stalk radius $R$ is defined by the condition on the local volume fractions $\phi_A(R,0)-\phi_B(R,0)=0$. (c) The metastable stalk itself, which we label $S_1$. Its radius is $R=1.2R_g$. (d) The unstable transition state between the metastable stalk and the hemifusion diaphragm. This transition state is denoted $S_2$. Its radius is $R=2.8R_g$. (e) A small hemifusion diaphragm of radius $R=3.4R_g$. The radius is shown explicitly. }

26 — math/0312329

\caption{The number of \ptwoirred\manifolds of given complexity (up to$9$) and geometry (empty boxes contain $0$).}