2004

1 — cond-mat/0401059

\caption{The temperature dependence of a) the amplitude and b) the relaxation time of the sub-picosecond relaxation component. The amplitude exhibits a sharp drop at the second order phase transition to the 3D ordered CDW state at T$_{c}^{3D}=183$ K. Above 183 K the amplitude gradually decreases to \symbol{126}250\K, and remains constant above that temperature. The behavior above T$_{c}^{3D}$ is a manifestation of a fluctuating presence of short range segments with 3D order. This is schematically presented in insets shown by the charge density modulation along the chains at $T<T_{c}^{3D}$ (long range 3D order) and at $T>T_{c}^{3D}$ (short range 3D fluctuations when $\xi_{\bot}$ exceeds the interchain separation). b) The temperature dependence of the CDW state recovery dynamics. Dashed lines present the fits using Eqs.(\ref{NphBCS}% ,\ref{e25}) respectively.}

2 — astro-ph/0402199

\caption{Comparison of the relativistic line profile computed by our model ({\color{red} red} solid line) with that computed by the \texttt{XSPEC diskline} model ({\color{blue} blue} dashed line) for $\epsilon \left( r_{e} \right) \propto r^{-3}$ and $f \left( \mu_{e} \right) = 1$. At inclinations of $< 30^{\circ}$, the profiles match to within $\sim10\%$, but the increaing importance of lightbending (which is not included in the {\tt diskline} code) gives a $~ 40 \%$ discrepancy in the profile shapes for inclinations $>60^{\circ}$. In this and all subsequent figures the line profiles are normalised such that they contain one photon, and all our results are unsmoothed. }

\caption{Comparison of the relativistic line profile computed by our model ({\color{red} red} solid line) with that computed by the \texttt{XSPEC laor} model ({\color{blue} blue} dashed line) for $\epsilon \left( r_{e} \right) \propto r^{-3}$ and $f \left( \mu_{e} \right) \propto \left(1+2.06\mu_e \right)$. The profiles produced by the two models match to within $~5 - 10\%$.} \label{fig:3.3.1} \end{center} \end{figure*} We have taken a disc from $r_{ms}$ to $r_{max} = 20 r_{g}$ (beyond which strong gravitational effects become of diminishing importance) for both the Schwarzschild ($a = 0$, $r_{ms} = 6 r_{g}$) and maximal Kerr ($a = 0.998$, $r_{ms} = 1.235 r_{g}$) cases for $\theta_{o} = 5^{\circ} , 30^{\circ}, 60^{\circ}$ and $85^{\circ}$. We first consider the extent of lightbending effects in a Schwarzschild spacetime. Figure \ref{fig:3.1.1} shows the three-dimensional surface in $\left(\mu_{e}, r_{e}, g \right)$ for the complete set of light travel paths connecting the accretion disc to the observer. There is a considerable range of $\mu_{e}$ contributing to the observed emission at all inclinations. For low inclinations the effect is fairly uniform, with each radius contributing a similar range in $\mu_e$, but with a systematic shift to larger emission angles (smaller $\mu_e$) with smaller radii. By contrast, at higher inclinations the lightbending is strong enough to gravitationally lens the far side of the disc. This leads to a much larger range of $\mu_e$ which contribute to the disc image at small radii. In all cases, lightbending means there {\em is} a range of $\mu_e$ which contribute to the observed disc emission, so that in general, the line profile {\em will} depend on the angular distribution of the emitted flux. Fig. \ref{fig:3.1.2} shows the corresponding surfaces for the extreme Kerr case. The disc now extends down to $1.235r_{g}$, far closer to the corresponding event horizon than in the Schwarzschild case. This introduces a greater complexity to the geodesic surfaces. The range of emission angles is from zero to unity in all cases, including the nearly face on disc at $5^{\circ}$, which has important consequences for the calculation of the line profile. To construct the relativistic line profile, we map these surfaces on to the $\left( \alpha, \beta \right)$ plane as discussed in the previous section, forming images of the accretion disc, as have been previously calculated by e.g. \cite{CB73,L79,HM97,F97,FMA00}. In Figure \ref{fig:3.1.3} we present images of the Schwarzchild disc for the $30^{\circ}$ (top row) and $\theta_{o} = 85^{\circ}$ (bottom row) cases (others provide no new information qualitatively). Images on the left-hand side of the figure are coloured by values of the redshift factor, $g$, as defined by the scale at the top of each image. By contrast, images on the right-hand side of the figure has each redshift bin coloured by its area on the observers sky, i.e. $g^{4} d\alpha d\beta$, again with the scale defined at the top of each image. Strong gravitational lensing effects can now clearly be seen in the high inclination images. Photons from the far side of the disc pass close to the black hole, so the disc image is strongly distorted (\citealt{MPS93,ZR03}). Since the area of the disc is magnified, its contribution to the observed flux should be large. However, we stress that the low inclination images {\em are} also affected by lightbending (see Figure \ref{fig:3.1.1}a and \ref{fig:3.1.2}a), though they are not magnified by gravitational lensing. The form of the line profile is now determined from the flux image (representing the effects of strong gravity), together with the assumed form for the emissivity (determined by the energy release and radiative transfer processes), which is generally taken as (ignoring azimuthal dependence): \begin{align} \label{eqn:3.1.1} \varepsilon \left( r_{e}, \mu_{e} \right) = \epsilon \left( r_{e} \right) f \left( \mu_{e} \right) \end{align} While the flux image is a difficult numerical problem, it depends on well known {\em physics}. By contrast, the emissivity laws considered have rather simple forms, but are determined by the poorly known {\em astrophysics} of the disc. Of course, there are many other outstanding theoretical issues that can produce a substantial impact on the line profile, including (but not limited to) returning radiation or lightbending that can enhance the emissivity of the inner part of the disc (\citealt{C75,LNP90,MKM00}), emission from the plunging region (\citealt{RB97}) and azimuthal dependence of the emissivity (\citealt{CCF03,KMS01}). However, these are outside the scope of the current work. \subsection{Comparison with the Diskline Model} The {\tt diskline} code assumes a Schwarzchild metric ($a=0$) and additionally that light travels in straight lines (so the angular emissivity term is irrelevant). In its {\tt XSPEC} implementation it allows both arbitrary power law $\epsilon \left(r_{e} \right)\propto r^q$ and point source illumination. However, its analytic structure means that any radial emissivity law is easy to incorporate. We choose to use $q=-3$, as this is approximately the form of the gravitational energy release per unit disc area (see e.g. \citealt{ZDS98}). Figure \ref{fig:3.2.1} shows our line profiles assuming $f(\mu_{e})=1$ (no angular dependance of the emissivity) compared with those from the {\tt diskline} code. We see that our new model matches very closely to the \texttt{XSPEC diskline} model for a nearly face on disk. Whilst the key difference between our model and \texttt{diskline} is the inclusion of light-bending effects, the impact of this is small at low inclinations if there is no angular dependance to the emissivity (but see Section 3.4). By contrast, at high inclinations, lightbending not only means that the line is formed from many different $\mu_{e}$, but gravitational lensing enhances the flux from the far side of the disc. This lensing effect gives clear differences between our model and \texttt{diskline}. The lensing magnifies the image of the far side of the disc, which has velocity mostly tangential to the line of sight, so is not strongly doppler shifted. This boosts the line profile at $g\sim 1$ (see \citealt{MPS93}). Since the line profiles are all normalised to a single photon, then this also makes the blue peak smaller. In summary, the \texttt{diskline} model as incorporated into {\sc XSPEC} produces line profiles which are accurate to $\sim 10$\% for inclinations of less than $30^\circ$. Obviously, if the inner disc edge $r_{min} > r_{ms}$ then the lightbending effects become correspondingly smaller and the match between the two codes becomes even closer. At higher inclinations the differences between {\tt diskline} and our code become larger due to the effects of gravitational lensing, which leads to an effective redistribution in flux between the blue peak and the center of the line compared to that predicted from straight light travel paths. \subsection{Comparison with the Laor Model} By contrast, the \texttt{laor} code is written for extreme Kerr, and includes a standard limb darkening law $f(\mu_e)\propto (1+2.06\mu_e)$. The code is based on a series of photon trajectory calculations, where the disk is split up into a set of rings of width $dr_{e}$ at $r_{e}$. Each part of the ring radiates with total emissivity (radial plus angular) given simply by the limb darkening law (i.e. no radial dependance, $q=0$) and the line profile from that ring is built up from many light travel paths which connect the disc to the observer. This produces a series of {\em transfer functions} $T(r_{e},E_o-gE_{int})$ at each radius, analogous to Figure \ref{fig:3.1.3}a--d but including the limb darkening law. These tabulated transfer functions are read by the \texttt{laor} code in {\sc XSPEC} and used to build a total line profile for any given radial emissivity $F_{o}(E_{o})=\int\varepsilon(r_{e})T(r_{e},E_{o}-gE_{int})r_{e}dr_{e}dg$. We compare this with our code, using a $q=-3$ emissivity for both as in the \texttt{diskline} comparisons above. We include the same limb darkening law as used by \texttt{laor} and the results (Figure \ref{fig:3.3.1}) show that the overall match between our code and \texttt{laor} is good to $\sim 5-10$\%. \section{The Role of the Angular Emissivity and Black Hole Spin} \begin{figure} \leavevmode \begin{center} \includegraphics[width=0.9\columnwidth]{fig341.ps} \caption{Comparison of the relativistic line profiles generated by our model with (a) $\epsilon \left(r_{e} \right)\propto r_{e}^{-3}$, $f \left(\mu_{e} \right)= 1$ ({\color{red} red} lines), (b) $\epsilon \left(r_{e} \right) \propto r_{e}^{-3}$, $f \left(\mu_{e} \right) \propto \mu^{-1}_{e}$ ({\color{blue} blue} lines), (c) $\epsilon \left(r_{e} \right)\propto r_{e}^{-3}$, $f \left(\mu_{e} \right) \propto \left(1 + 2.06 \mu_{e} \right)$ ({\color{green} green} lines) for a maximal Kerr black hole with the disc extending from $1.235 - 20 r_{g}$. The relative height of the blue wing changes by $\sim 35$\% for different angular emissivity laws, anti-correlated with the slope of the red wing. }

\caption{As in Fig. \ref{fig:3.4.1} with the disc now extending from $1.235 - 6 r_{g}$. The additional {\color{magenta} magenta} line is for a limb darkened angular emissivity with more centrally concentrated radial emissivity, $\propto r_{e}^{-4.5}$. This is very similar to the {\color{blue} blue} line profile derived from a very different radial emissivity, $\propto r_{e}^{-3}$, with a limb brightened angular emissivity. }

3 — astro-ph/0402243

\caption{EGRET all-sky map in continuum \gray\emission for energies$>$100 MeV (A.~W.~Strong, unpublished). \label{fig:skymap}}

\caption{A schematic view of cosmic ray propagation in the interstellar medium (ISM), production of secondary nuclei, particles and \grays. \label{fig:cr_propagation}}

\caption{ Spectrum of the Galactic diffuse \gray\emission from high latitudes$0^\circ<l<360^\circ$. Left: $20^\circ<b<60^\circ$. Right: $60^\circ<b<90^\circ$. The lines are coded as in Fig.\\ref{fig:GRB}. EGRET data are shown by error bars. Adapted from Strong et al.\(2003a). \label{fig:poles}}

\caption{ Profiles in longitude along the Galactic plane (top) and latitude (bottom) of the Galactic diffuse \gray\emission in the energy range 300--500 MeV. The components shown (from top to bottom) are total flux (blue),$\pi^0$-decay (red), inverse Compton (green), electron bremsstrahlung (cyan). The horizontal line is the extragalactic diffuse emission. EGRET data are shown by error bars. Adapted from Strong et al.\(2004). \label{fig:profiles}}

\caption{ Spectrum of the extragalactic diffuse \gray\emission. The solid line (a power-law fit with index --2.1) and the data points (gray) along the line in the EGRET energy range is the EGB as derived by Sreekumar et al.\(1998). The small circles (red) with error bars below the line show our new determination of the EGB. Adapted from Strong et al.\(2003b). \label{fig:EXGRB}}

4 — hep-lat/0402030

\caption{\label{R0_OVER_R1_PLOT} A ``shape parameter'' for the static potential, $r_0/r_1$. The \tmpred octagons are from coarse ($a \approx 0.12$ fm) lattices with three degenerate quark flavors, and the \tmpred squares from coarse lattices with two light and one strange quark. At $(M_\pi/M_\rho)^2=0.15$ the upper square is from the $L=28$ run and the lower from the $L=20$ run. The \tmpblue crosses are from the fine ($a \approx 0.09$ fm) runs. The single \tmpgreen diamond is from a two flavor simulation. The \tmpmagenta burst is the continuum and chiral extrapolation discussed in the text, with the smaller error bar the statistical error and the larger the systematic error. In this figure we have chosen to use $(M_\pi/M_\rho)^2$ for the abscissa instead of the $(M_\pi r_1)^2$ used in other figures because this lets us put the entire range of quark masses up to the quenched limit ($M_\pi \rightarrow \infty$) in the graph. }

\caption{\label{MNUC_FIG} Nucleon masses. The \tmpblue diamonds and octagons are quenched coarse and fine runs respectively. The \tmpred squares are three flavor coarse lattice results, and the \tmpred bursts the three flavor fine lattices. The \tmpmagenta fancy plusses connected by the straight line and the two curved lines are continuum and chiral extrapolations discussed in the text. The fancy diamond is the experimental value, with an error bar from the uncertainty in $r_1$. }

\caption{\label{A0_DECAY_FIG} $0^{++}$ energies. The \tmpred squares are three flavor coarse runs, and the \tmpred fancy plusses, three flavor fine runs. The \tmpblue octagons are a quenched coarse run and the \tmpblue burst a quenched fine run. The \tmpcyan decorated square is an excited $0^{++}$ mass from one of the runs. The \tmpgreen diamonds and crosses are sums of $\pi$ and $\eta$ masses on coarse and fine runs respectively, where the $\eta$ mass is estimated from $M_\eta^2=\frac{1}{3} M_\pi^2 + \frac{2}{3} m_{s\bar s}^2$, with $m_{s\bar s}$ the unmixed $s \bar s$ pseudoscalar mass. The straight \tmpblue line is an extrapolation of $a_0$ masses from heavier quark runs (not shown in this graph). }

\caption{\label{MB1_R1_FIG} $1^{+-}$ energies. The \tmpred squares are three flavor coarse runs and the \tmpred bursts three flavor fine runs. The \tmpblue octagons and crosses are quenched coarse and fine runs respectively. The \tmpgreen diamonds and fancy plusses are sums of rho and pion masses on coarse and fine three flavor runs respectively. The fancy diamond on the left is the experimental value, with an error bar corresponding to the uncertainty in $r_1$. }

\caption{\label{J_fig} The ``J'' parameter. The \tmpred squares and crosses are three flavor coarse and fine lattice results respectively. The \tmpblue octagons and plus signs are quenched coarse and fine results, while the \tmpgreen diamond is a two flavor run. The \tmpmagenta decorated squares are CP-PACS/JLQCD three flavor Wilson quark results\protect\cite{Kaneko2003}. The cross at the left is the original UKQCD quenched estimate\protect\cite{UKQCD_J}, and the burst at the left is the experimental value. }

5 — nucl-ex/0403042

\caption{The correlation functions for (a) pion-proton at $130 AGeV$, (b) pion-kaon at $200 AGeV$, (c) pion-proton at $200 AGeV$ and (d) kaon-proton at $200 AGeV$. The \fullcircle points are for $++$ combination, \opencircle for $--$, \fullsquare~for $+-$ and \opensquare~for $-+$. Solid lines show fits to the data, dashed lines show theoretical expectation.\label{cffig}}

\caption{Comparing (a) pion-kaon, (b) pion-proton and (c) kaon-proton correlation function fit results (\opencircle symbols) for $\langle r^{*}_{out} \rangle$ with model predictions: blast-wave parameterization(thin solid line) and RQMD(thick solid line). We show a space(dotted line) - $ \langle \Delta r_{out} \rangle$ and time (dashed line) - $\langle \Delta t \rangle$ component of the asymmetry from RQMD separately. The results of the fit to the RQMD simulations are shown as $\star$ symbols.}

6 — cond-mat/0404165

\caption{Normalized effective Young's modulus $E^{\sf e}/E_s$ as a function of solid volume fraction $q$. The experimental data are illusrated with symbols ($\Box$). Iso-thickness lines are also shown with thick lines, and corresponding normalized thickness values are indicated for each line. The dashed (\kesik) and dotted (\dotted) lines represent quadratic relations for the experimental ($\log E^{\sf e}/E_s = 10\,x^2-8.9\,x-0.84$) and the iso-thickness line $t/a=0.075$ ($\log E^{\sf e}/E_s = 9.4\,x^2-11\,x+0.59$), respectively.\label{fig:qtvsE}}

7 — cond-mat/0404174

\caption{\small Ratio of horizontal and vertical temperatures versus particle-particle restitution coefficient. Solid line: Theoretical prediction (\ref{eq11}). Dashed line: Theoretical asymptotic behavior (\ref{eq11a}). Symbols: MD simulations for the same system as in Fig. \ref{Fig1}a with $\PP =20$ (\textcolor{red}{$\star$}% red ) and $\PP =50$ (\textcolor{blue}{$\bullet$}%blue ) particles. For $e_p\not = 0.9$, a different choice for the frequency $f$ such that the $T_z$ was (approximately) the same for all $e_p$. Inset: Same, but for fixed $e_p=0.9$ and variable local solid fraction $\sigma := (4/3) \pi \rad^3 \max[n({\bf r})]$, either by varying particle number $\PP$ (\textcolor{blue}{$\Diamond$}, at $r=1.18$ mm) or radius $\rad$ (\textcolor{red}{$\Box$}, at $N=50$). %Here, $n_{max}$ is the %measured maximum value of the particle density $n(z)$. }

8 — cond-mat/0404183

\caption{(color online) Temperature dependent data comparing resistance and integrated intensity for the CO, AFM and FM peaks from a single crystal PCSMO75 sample. Solid circles (\textcolor{blue}{\protect\large $\bullet $}) represent zero field data collected on cooling, solid triangles (\textcolor{red}{$\blacktriangle $}) are zero field data collected on warming, open triangles ($\triangle $) represent zero field data collected upon warming after application of a 5 T field. (a) shows intensity of the (2$\frac{{1}}{{4}}$ 1$\frac{{3}}{{4}}$ 0) CO peak, (b) ($\frac{{1}}{{2}}$ 0 0) antiferromagnetic peak, and (c) (1 0 0) ferromagnetic peak collected as a function of temperature. (d) Transport data showing resistance (semi-log scale) as a function of temperature. The dashed vertical lines represent, from right to left, the CO transition, the Curie temperature, decrease in FM upon warming, rapid increase in FM upon cooling.}

\caption{(color online) SANS data collected on NG7 showing intensity plotted as a function of temperature. Blue circles (\textcolor{blue}{\protect\large $\bullet$}) are data collected upon cooling, and red triangles (\textcolor{red}{$\blacktriangle$}) are data collected upon warming. Fig. (a) and (b) show intensity changes at the specific q values 0.028 and 0.013 {\AA}$^{-1}$ respectively. (c) shows total detector counts, for the area detector.}

\caption{(color online)(a) Neutron diffraction data for single crystal PCSMO75 at T = 0.08 K, showing peak intensity as a function of applied field for the CO peak (2$\frac{{1}}{{4}}$ 1$\frac{{3}}{{4}}$ 0). Solid circles (\textcolor{blue}{\protect\large $\bullet$}) are data collected while increasing the field from the zero field-cooled state. Solid triangles (\textcolor{red}{$\blacktriangle$}) are data collected as the field was returned to zero. (b) Sample temperature as a function of time during the PCSMO75 neutron diffraction measurements. The jumps in sample temperature versus time are coincident with the magnetization steps.}

\caption{(color online)Neutron data for polycrystalline PCSMO70 at T = 0.1 K showing integrated intensity as a function of applied field. (a) nuclear and ferromagnetic intensity at (1 0 0) and (b) antiferromagnetic signal at ($\frac{1}{2}$ 0 0). Solid circles (\textcolor{blue}{\protect\large $\bullet $}) represent increasing the field from a zero field cooled state. Solid triangles (\textcolor{red}{$\blacktriangle $}) represent returning the field to zero.}

\caption{(color online)Rocking curves for the antiferromagnetic Bragg peak [q= ($\frac{1}{2}$ 0 0)] for the PCSMO70 sample collected at T= 2.0 K. Data at 1.74 T ( \textcolor{blue}{\protect\large $\bullet $}) show a complete rocking curve. The data for 1.75 T (\textcolor{red}{$\blacksquare $}) begin to follow the same curve, but suddenly the intensity disappears. The rocking curve at 1.76 T (\textcolor{green}{$\blacktriangle $}) shows that the peak is completely gone.}

9 — astro-ph/0405275

\caption{\Xco\as function of$R$. Dotted horizontal line, black: as used in \citet{strongmattox96,SMR00}; solid line, black: as used for \grays in this work; dashed, dark blue: from \citet{sodroski95}; dash-dot, red: using metallicity gradient as described in the text, \Xco$\propto Z^{-2.5}$ \citep{israel00}, two lines for [O/H] = 0.04 and 0.07 dex/kpc; dash-dot-dot,light blue: using \Xco$\propto Z^{-1.0}$ \citep{boselli02} and [O/H] = 0.07 dex/kpc. The values using metallicity are normalized approximately to those from the \gray analysis.}

\caption{Longitude profile of \grays for 1000--2000 MeV, averaged over $|b|<5.5\deg$. Vertical bars: EGRET data; lines are model components convolved with the EGRET point-spread function: green: inverse Compton emission, red: $\pi^0$-decay, light blue: bremsstrahlung, dark blue: total.}

\caption{Latitude profile of \grays for 1000--2000 MeV, averaged over $330\deg<l<30\deg$. Data and curves as in Fig.~\ref{fig3}. The extragalactic background is shown as a black horizontal line. }

10 — astro-ph/0405441

\caption{Comparison of our \EB\spectrum (solid, red) as given in Table\ref{EGRB_flux} with that from \citet{sreekumar98} (dots, magenta). The dashed (blue) line is the \citeauthor{sreekumar98} fit: $2.743\times10^{-3} E^{-2.1}$ cm$^{-2}$ s$^{-1}$ sr$^{-1}$ MeV$^{-1}$. \vspace{0mm}}

\caption{Extragalactic X-ray and \gray spectrum. Data compilation from \citet{sreekumar98} except for COMPTEL \citep{weidenspointner00} and EGRET 30 MeV -- 20 GeV (this work). }

\caption{\EB\spectrum determined for each of the regions in Table~\ref{isotropy}. Red bars: hemispheres, blue bars: quarter spheres. The upper and lower bound spectra are shown in green, and the adopted \EB\in black. Energies are shifted slightly for clarity. The dashed (blue) line is the\citeauthor{sreekumar98} fit. }

11 — cs/0405039

\caption{ Ordering-task performance, in terms of \predAcc, as a function of the number of documents in the training set.}

\caption{\Nameh performance on Earthquakes as a function of model size. Ordering: \predAcc; Summarization: extraction accuracy.}

12 — hep-lat/0405022

\caption{Partially quenched data for squared meson masses made out of valence quarks $x$ and $y$ as a function of $m_x/m'_s$. We show results from two lattices: a coarse lattice with sea quark masses $a\hat m'=0.01$, $am'_s=0.05$, and a fine lattice with $a\hat m'=0.0062$, $am'_s=0.031$. Three sets of ``kaon'' points with $m_y=m'_s, 0.8 m'_s, 0.6 m'_s$, are plotted for each lattice. ``Pion'' points have $m_x=m_y$. The solid lines come from a fit to all the data (not just that plotted). The statistical errors in the points, as well as the variation in the data with sea quark masses are not visible on this scale. The \tmpgreen dashed lines give the continuum fit described in the text, and the \tmpmagenta vertical dotted line gives the physical $\hat m/m_s$ obtained.}

13 — hep-th/0405144

\caption{Plot of $m(x)/m_{\infty}$ as a function of $x$ for \red{ $v=1.4$}, \blue{$v=1$}, \magenta{ $v=0.7$} and \green{ $v=0.6$} }

14 — quant-ph/0405072

\caption{Phase-difference distributions. Left: From the Wigner function ($s=0$) for (a) even and (c) odd Schr\" odinger cat states with$|\al|=|\ba|$. Right: Dependence on the ordering parameter, $s=-1$ (\full), $s=0$ (\broken) and $s=0.4$ (\dashed) for (b) even and (d) odd Schr\" odinger cat states with$|\al|=|\ba|=1$.}

15 — astro-ph/0406015

\caption{\label{Fig:Spec}Observed \xmm spectra for single (black, $\diamond$) and double (\textcolor[named]{Red}{red, $\bullet$}) events, together with the best fit power law spectrum.}

16 — astro-ph/0406031

\caption[]{A selection of XRB spectral measurements collected from observations with different satellites as labeled. ROSAT blue \cite{ioannis}; \beppo\green\cite{vecchi}; \xmm\magenta\cite{lumb} and yellow \cite{deluca}; RXTE cyan \cite{revni}; HEAO1--A2 black \cite{gruber} and HEAO1--A4 LED green \cite{gruber}; HEAO1--A4 MED red \cite{kinzer}. Also reported is the integrated contribution of resolved sources in the \chandra\CDFS\cite{tozzi} (gold points) and in \xmm\Lockman hole\cite{worsley} (red bow--tie). The solid magenta curve represents the analytical fit of Gruber \cite{gruber} renormalized upward by 30\% in order to fit the most recent measurements. The blue ($E_{cut}$ = 400 keV) and red ($E_{cut}$ = 100 keV) solid curves represent the integrated contribution of the model described in the text. The short--dashed curves correspond to unabsorbed AGN ($logN_H < 22$ cm$^{-2}$), while the long--dashed curves correspond to obscured Compton--thin sources ($22 < logN_H < 24$ cm$^{-2}$).}

17 — astro-ph/0406250

\caption{Sensitivities of past, current and future high energy \gray\detectors\cite{Morselli}.}

\caption{Multiwavelength spectrum of Galactic diffuse \gray\emission. Hard X-ray/\gray\Galactic diffuse emission as measured by HIREGS (triangles), RXTE, OSSE/CGRO (diamonds), COMPTEL/CGRO, and EGRET/CGRO. Also shown is the calculated flux (solid), and separate components: bremsstrahlung (dash-dot), IC (short dash), and neutral pions (triple dot-dash). Adapted from Boggs et al.~(2000).}

\caption{Multiwavelength spectrum of the diffuse extragalactic emission from X-rays to \grays\taken from Sreekumar et al.~(1998). The dot-dashed and dashed lines are estimates of the contributions of Seyfert I and Seyfert II galaxies respectively. The triple dot-dashed line represents the steep-spectrum quasar contribution and the dotted line is for type Ia supernovae. The long dashed line is an estimate of the contribution from blazars. The thick solid line is the sum of all components.}

\caption{Extragalactic \gray\flux (multiplied by E$^2$) for two sample thermal relic neutralinos (dotted curves), summed with the unresolved blazar background expected for GLAST (dashed curve) \cite{ullio02}.}

\caption{Shock waves from SNR can produce high-energy \grays\in two ways: IC scattering of CMB photons off relativistic electrons, and$\pi^{0}$-decay from interactions of relativistic protons in the ISM. Adapted from Aharonian~(2002).}

\caption{\gray\flux expected from the Coma cluster. The solid curve shows the bremsstrahlung flux produced by the relic population of electrons (derived from the UV flux). Heavy dashed and thin dashed show the bremsstrahlung and IC fluxes produced by radio electrons ($B=1\ \mu$G). Dotted and dash-dotted curves correspond to the $\pi^0$-decay produced by protons (index $-2.1$) with total energy $3\times10^{62}$ and $3\times10^{61}$ erg, correspondingly \cite{atoyan00}.}

\caption{Coma cluster. Predictions for the \gray\flux,$F_\gamma(>100 {\rm MeV})$ cm$^{-2}$ s$^{-1}$, expected for a Coma-like cluster are compared with the sensitivity of the next generation \gray\experiments. Lines are coded as following: short-dash -- electron bremsstrahlung for$B=0.3\ \mu$G, long-dash -- electron bremsstrahlung for $B=1\ \mu$G, black curve -- $\pi^0$-decay from $pp$-interactions and associated uncertainties (dark shaded region), black solid line -- $\pi^0$-decay from neutralino annihilations and associated uncertainties (light shaded region) \cite{cola02}.}

\caption[Statistics of \gray\sources at GeV and TeV energies.]{Statistics of \gray\sources at GeV and TeV energies.}

18 — astro-ph/0406358

\caption{Ongoing \&\textcolor{blue}{Future} CMB Polarization Experiments}

19 — cond-mat/0406166

\caption{\label{fig:seven} Dependence on pressure and reduced volume of the magnetic hyperfine field $B_{\mathrm{hf}}$ and of the electric quadrupole interaction $\Delta$$E_{\mathrm{Q}}$ of Sm metal at $T$~=~3~K. The symbols \fullsquare\and\opensquare\refer to the hexagonal and cubic sites of the Sm-type structure, respectively, while\fullcircle refer to the single site for the other structural phases. The reduced volume scale is approximately determined from reference~\cite{ZPH94}. Note the coexistence of the distorted fcc and primitive hexagonal phases at 39~GPa.}

20 — cond-mat/0406429

\caption{Calculated piezoelectric coefficients $d_{33}^{\sf e}$ as a function of (a) the relative permittivity of phase {\sf a} and (b) Young's modulus of phase {\sf a}. The symbols $(\circ)$ and the solid lines (\full) represent the results of the FE calculations and the analytical expression of Eq.~(\ref{eq:1}), respectively. The dotted (\dotted) lines represent the permittivity and Young's modulus of phase {\sf b}, respectively. The inset in (a) illustrates the numerical results for $\varepsilon_{\sf a}=\varepsilon_{\sf_b}$ for various voltages, the slope is the piezoelectric coefficient, $246\ \pico\meter\reciprocal\volt$.}

\caption{Thickness change $y-y_0$ in a three-layer structure for (a) bi- and (b) mono-polar charge distributions as a function of the voltage difference between the electrodes $\Delta V=V_{\rm AB}-V_{\rm CD}$. The symbols are the values calculated with the FE method. The solid lines (\full) are the best linear and quadratic fits. In (b) the fitted curve is separated into its linear (\dotted) and quadratic (\dash) parts, in order to show the electrostrictive and piezoelectric contributions.}

21 — hep-th/0406171

\caption[moduliev]{\label{moduliev} The real parts of the superfields, \blue{$S_R$}, \red{$T_R$}, \green{$Z_R$} as a function of $\alpha(t)$, which is essentially the number of e-folds. The dash-dotted lines show the analytic approximations explained in the text.}

\caption[fig:endens]{\label{fig:endens} Logarithm of the energy densities for the background fluid, \blue{$\rho_b$}, and the real parts of the superfields, \red{$\rho_{\phi}$}, as a function of $\alpha$.}

\caption[fig:compf]{\label{fig:compf} Evolution and analytic approximations (dotted lines) for the component fields \blue{$\vphi$}, \red{$\beta$}, \green{$z$} as a function of $\alpha$.}

\caption[fig:axions]{\label{fig:axions} Evolution of the axions, \blue{$S_I$}, \red{$T_I$}, \green{$Z_I$} as a function of the number of e-folds, $\alpha$.}

22 — astro-ph/0407554

\caption{Left: The dots indicate the measured $\gamma$-ray signal as function of angular distance to Cassiopeia A as measured by the HEGRA experiment. The shaded area is a background estimate \cite{hegra}. Right: Integral $\gamma$-ray fluxes due to inverse Compton scattering, non-thermal bremsstrahlung and $\pi^0$-decay according to the model by Berezhko \etal\compared with measurements of the HEGRA and EGRET experiments\cite{berezhkocasa}. The dotted line is obtained for an assumed cut-off at 4~TeV.}

\caption{Energy spectra for elemental groups. Top left: protons, top right: helium, and bottom: iron nuclei. Open symbols give results of direct measurements, for references see \cite{knie}. Filled symbols represent results from air shower measurements: KASCADE electrons/muons interpreted with two interaction models \cite{kascade} (preliminary), KASCADE single hadrons \cite{shspek}, and EAS-Top \cite{eastop}. The data are compared to predictions of calculations by Kalmykov \etal\\cite{kalmykov} (\dotted), Sveshnikova \etal\\cite{sveshnikova} (\dashed), and the Poly-Gonato model \cite{knie} (\line).}

23 — cond-mat/0407304

\caption{\label{fig:mag} (color online) The magnetization per spin $m$ as a function of time (mcs) for $R=1$ at $h=0.40$ ({\color{green}$\times$}) (right axis) and $R=10$ at $h=1.15$ ({\color{red}$+$}) (left axis). Note the flat region of $m$ where the $R=10$ system is in metastable equilibrium. There is no metastable equilibrium for $R=1$ and $h=0.40$.}

\caption{\label{fig:r1} (color online) Survival curves for heterogeneous nucleation ({\color{red}$\circ$}), homogeneous nucleation (no impurity present) ({\color{green}$\times$}), and heterogeneous nucleation on a wall ({\color{blue}$\bullet$}) for $R=1$. The curves for nucleation in the presence of the impurity and on the wall are shifted to the right by $\Delta h=0.174$ and $\Delta h=0.255$, respectively, to make it clearer that their shape is qualitatively different from the homogeneous nucleation curve.}

\caption{\label{fig:r10} (color online) Survival curves for homogeneous nucleation ({\color{green}$\times$}) (no impurity) and heterogeneous nucleation ({\color{red}$\circ$}) for $R=10$. The latter curve is shifted to the right by $\Delta h = 0.026$ to make it clearer that the shape of the two curves is almost identical.}

\caption{\label{fig:wall} (color online) Survival curves for homogeneous nucleation ({\color{green}$\times$}) and heterogeneous nucleation ({\color{red}$\circ$}) on a wall for $R=10$. The heterogeneous curve is shifted to the right by $\Delta h=0.64$.}

\caption{\label{fig:density} (color online) The average density $\lb \rho \rb$ of the critical droplet as a function of the radius $r$ measured from the center of mass for $R=10$. ({\color{red}$+$} signs indicate heterogeneous nucleation and {$\color{green}\times$} signs indicate homogeneous nucleation.)}

24 — cond-mat/0407321

\caption{\label{f:greek} Option price and Greeks for plain vanilla (\full), Asian (\opensquare) and barrier knock out (\opencircle) call options. }

25 — cond-mat/0407361

\caption{(a) Superfluid fraction $f_{\mathrm{s}}$ as function of the interaction strength $V/J$ \cite{RoBu03c,RoBu03a} for a commensurate system with $I=N=10$ \linemediumsolid[FGRed]\and for non-commensurate filling$I=10, N=8$ \linemediumdashed[FGBlue]. (b) Energy gap between ground state and first excited state for the same two cases.}

\caption{Position of the centroid \eqref{eq:centroid} of the dynamic structure factor as function of $k$ for a single-component Bose gas with (a) $N=10$ particles and (b) $N=8$ particles, resp., in a $I=10$ lattice. The interaction strengths are $V/J=0$ \symbolcirclesmall[FGBlue], $5$ \symboldiamond[FGRed], $10$ \symboltriangle[FGGreen], and $15$ \symbolbox[FGViolet]. The points are connected by straight lines to guide the eye.}

\caption{Position of the centroid $\Omega_{\mathrm{D}}(k)$ of the dynamic density structure factor as function of $k$ for a two-component Fermi gas with $N_{\FA}=N_{\FB}=5$ (a) and $N_{\FA}=N_{\FB}=4$ (b), resp., in a $I=10$ lattice. Results are shown for repulsive interactions with $V/J=0$ \symbolcirclesmall[FGBlue], $3$ \symboldiamond[FGRed], $6$ \symboltriangle[FGGreen], and $9$ \symbolbox[FGViolet]. The points are connected by straight lines to guide the eye.}

\caption{Centroid $\Omega_{\mathrm{S}}(k)$ of the dynamic spin structure factor for a two-component Fermi gas with $N_{\FA}=N_{\FB}=5$ (a) and $N_{\FA}=N_{\FB}=4$ (b), resp., and attractive interactions $V/J=0$ \symbolcirclesmall[FGBlue], $-3$ \symboldiamond[FGRed], $-6$ \symboltriangle[FGGreen], and $-9$ \symbolbox[FGViolet].}

26 — math-ph/0407013

\caption{\label{fig:5}Local density of states on a Ag monolayer in a Au(001)/Ag/Au(001) sandwich structure calculated using a relativistic scattering method (\full) and relativistic embedding (\fulltriangle). The insets shows the calculation geometry (left) and the local density of states obtained from the Schr\"odinger equation (right).}

27 — q-bio/0407040

\caption{\sf Correlation of scores of decoys evaluated by nonlinear kernel folding scoring function and their RMSD values to the native proteins in the {\sc 4state\_reduced} set. }

\caption{ \sf Results of discrimination of native structures from decoys using nonlinear kernel scoring functions. The decoy sets include {\sc 4state\_reduced} set, {\sc Lattice\_ssfit} set, and {\sc lmsd} set \citep{SamudralaLevitt00_PS}. The rank of the native structure and its $z$-score are listed. The correlation coefficient $R$ is also listed in parenthesis for the {\sc 4state\_reduced} set. KFF stands for kernel folding scoring function, and KDF stands for kernel design scoring function. TE-13 scoring function is linear distance based scoring function optimized by linear programming, taken as reported in \citep{TobiElber00_Proteins}, BFKV the linear scoring function reported in \citep{Bastolla01_Proteins}, and MJ is the statistical scoring function as reported in \citep{Miyazawa96_JMB}. Results for TE-13 scoring function and Miyazawa-Jernigan scoring function are taken from Table II of \citep{TobiElber00_Proteins}. }

28 — quant-ph/0407191

\caption{\label{fig:dressab} $(a)$ Populations of the dressed states $|e_0\rangle$ (with eigenvalue $\epsilon_0=0$) (\dotted), $|e_3\rangle$ (eigenvalue $\epsilon_3$) (\chain) and $|e_4\rangle$ (eigenvalue $\epsilon_4$) (\full), for parameters as in \fref{fig:forpub1}$(a)$. The inset shows enlargement of the area around origin, with the exchange between the two dressed states. $(b)$ Eigenvalues $\epsilon_{3,4}$ (in units of $\gamma$) of the two dressed states as in $(a)$.}

29 — astro-ph/0408432

\caption{Examples of R-band optical images of V1647~Ori taken with the 1m RCC telescope of the Konkoly Observatory at three different phases of the outburst. North is at the top and east to the left. V1647\,Ori is located at the southern apex of the nebula. The color table has been scaled to represent the same brightness in all three images.}

\caption{Light curves of V1647 Ori in the {\it V\/(dots)}, {\it R\/}$_\mathrm{C}$ {\it (asterisks)}, {\it I\/}$_\mathrm{C}$ {\it (upward triangles)}, {\it J\/(squares)}, {\it H\/(downward triangles)}, and {\it K\/}$_s$ {\it (diamonds)} bands between 2004 February 16 and 2006 May 5 , based on the data presented in Tables~\ref{tab:opdata} and \ref{ta:irdata}. The uncertainties are comparable with symbol sizes.}

30 — physics/0408105

\caption{ Classification of reaction models with parameters defined in the bottom column. Symbol $\ge$ means that the value is non-negative and \textcolor{red}{$>$} means that the value must be positive. B means that the final state is chiral symmetry breaking and S means otherwise. Details for each entry are explained in the indicated sections. }

31 — hep-lat/0409129

\caption{ Omega mass fits versus minimum distance. This is the partially quenched $\Omega^-$, with valence mass close to the correct strange quark mass. The \tmpred octagons are fits with one state of each parity; \tmpblue squares include an (unconstrained) excited $\Omega$ state. The \tmpgreen diamonds are $\Delta$ fits. Symbol sizes are proportional to the confidence level, with the size of the legend corresponding to 50\%. }

32 — math/0409154

\caption{Problems I and II on the half-disk. Here and further on, \textcolor{red}{red solid line} denotes the Dirichlet boundary conditions and \textcolor{blue}{blue dashed line} the Neumann ones.\label{fig:fig1}}

\caption{Problems $\tilde{\text{I}}$ and $\tilde{\text{II}}$ on the quarter-disk and the map $\tilde{T}$. Here and further on, \textcolor{green}{green dash-dotted line} denotes the matching conditions.\label{fig:fig2}}

33 — math/0409416

\caption[Comparative Performance of Octrope]{This plot shows the time (in seconds) required to find the ropelength for trefoils as a function of the number of edges $n$ in the polygonal knot. The timings were computed on a $1.25$ Ghz Macintosh $G4$ computer, and represent averages over $10$ runs (for times above one second), or $100$ runs (for times below one second). The data marked with \makebox[5pt]{\setlength{\unitlength}{0.120450pt}\begin{picture}(5,12)(0,0)\put(1,14){\makebox(0,2){$\blacktriangle$}}\end{picture}} comes from \texttt{liboctrope} with the default tree depth of $\ell = \left\lceil \frac{3}{4} \log_2 n \right\rceil$, while the data marked with \makebox[5pt]{\setlength{\unitlength}{0.120450pt}\begin{picture}(5,12)(0,0)\put(1,14){\circle{20}}\end{picture}} comes from \texttt{liboctrope} with the tree depth set to $1$ to force $n(n-3)/2$ edge-edge checks. } \label{fig:trefoildata} \end{figure*} For trefoils, Algorithm~\ref{alg:1} was sometimes faster than \texttt{liboctrope} for very small numbers of edges. Figure~\ref{fig:crossover} shows the performance of both algorithms near the crossover point in some detail. \begin{figure*}[t] \input{./figs/crossover_plot.tex} \caption[Crossover between Algorithm 1 and Octrope]{ This log-log plot shows the time (in seconds) required to find ropelength for trefoils as a function of the number of edges $n$ in the polygonal knot near the crossover point where \texttt{liboctrope} becomes faster than Algorithm~\ref{alg:1}. As in Figure~\ref{fig:trefoildata}, the timings were computed on a $1.25$ Ghz Macintosh $G4$ computer, and represent averages over $10$ runs (for times above one second), or $100$ runs (for times below one second). The data marked with \makebox[5pt]{\setlength{\unitlength}{0.120450pt}\begin{picture}(5,12)(0,0)\put(1,14){\makebox(0,2){$\blacktriangle$}}\end{picture}} comes from \texttt{liboctrope} with the default tree depth of $\ell = \left\lceil\frac{3}{4} \log_2 n \right\rceil$, while the data marked with \makebox[5pt]{\setlength{\unitlength}{0.120450pt}\begin{picture}(5,12)(0,0)\put(1,14){\circle{20}}\end{picture}} comes from \texttt{liboctrope} with the tree depth set to $1$ to force $n(n-3)/2$ edge-edge checks. The data shows that \texttt{liboctrope} is faster than our implementation of Algorithm~\ref{alg:1} for trefoil knots with more than about $120$ edges.}

34 — q-bio/0409010

\caption{ \label{fig:qvariance_T} $\qvariance$ as a function of temperature for energy parameter $\StackE=-1.0$, $\PairE=0.0$. \legendsymbols%explanation of symbols only here }

35 — astro-ph/0410302

\caption{ Longterm R-band light curve of 3C~279 during the last ten years. The right line indicates the observation time of INTEGRAL in 2003, and the left line corresponds to a \gray\high state observation in 1999 (see section 3.3). The INTEGRAL observation was carried out during the lowest R-band flux state of the last 10 years. The figure is from\citet{Balonek04}. \label{fig:1} }

36 — astro-ph/0410720

\caption{\footnotesize \baselineskip 10pt Motions of components seen at 5 and 10.7~GHz in 3C\,120 between 1978 and 1988. The components are labeled and a straight line with slopes corresponding to the fitted proper motion is drawn through the points. The proper motion for each feature along with formal errors is written on the figure. Component labels here do not correspond to components in Figs.\1\& 3. For additional details see the Figure 4 caption and Table 3 in Walker et al.\(2001). \label{fig2}}

37 — cond-mat/0410683

\caption{(color online). Fermionization of $n^b_k$ during the expansion of the gas. (a) Decrease of $\delta$ (see text) as a function of time for $\tilde{\rho}=0.51$; $N_b=51$ (dashed line), $N_b=100$ (continuous line), $N_b=150$ (dotted line), and $N_b=200$ (dashed-dotted line). The inset shows the fermionization time $\tau_F$ (see text) vs $N_b$, for $\tilde{\rho}=0.51$. (b) Ratio $R$ between the size of gas for $\delta=0.05$ and its original size vs $\tilde{\rho}$, $N_b=100$. The inset shows $R$ vs $N_b$ for $\tilde{\rho}=0.25$ (\textcolor{green}{$\times$}) and $\tilde{\rho}=0.51$ (\textcolor{blue}{$\nabla$}).}

38 — physics/0410099

\caption{\em LAAPD dark current versus high voltage measured at 1\textcelsius\(\textasteriskcentered), 10\textcelsius\($\blacksquare$), and 23\textcelsius\($\blacklozenge$).}

\caption{\em LAAPD absolute x--ray gain versus high voltage measured at $-46$\textcelsius\($\boxtimes$), $-40$\textcelsius\($\triangle$), $-33$\textcelsius\($\ocircle$), $-17$\textcelsius\($\Diamond$), $-8$\textcelsius\($\square$), 0\textcelsius\(\textasteriskcentered), 10\textcelsius\($\blacksquare$), and 17\textcelsius\($\blacklozenge$).}

\caption{\em LAAPD absolute x--ray (\textasteriskcentered) and visible--light ($\blacklozenge$) gain versus temperature. Measurements were performed at constant high voltages with x~rays (solid lines) at (from right to left) 1530, 1560, 1600, 1640, 1670, 1720, and 1750~V and with visible light (dashed lines) at 1590, 1625, 1660, and 1700~V\@.}

\caption{\em LAAPD energy resolution for 5.9~keV x~rays versus gain measured at $-40$\textcelsius\($\triangle$), $-8$\textcelsius\($\square$), 0\textcelsius\(\textasteriskcentered), 10\textcelsius\($\blacksquare$), and 17\textcelsius\($\blacklozenge$).}

\caption{\em LAAPD energy resolution for visible light versus gain measured at $-12$\textcelsius\($\square$), 0\textcelsius\(\textasteriskcentered), and 10\textcelsius\($\blacksquare$). The energy equivalent of the light pulses corresponds to 11--14.5~keV x rays.}

\caption{\em LAAPD energy resolution for the test pulses versus gain, normalized to 5.9~keV. Measurements at $-12$\textcelsius\($\square$), 0\textcelsius\(\textasteriskcentered), and 10\textcelsius\($\blacksquare$).}

\caption{\em LAAPD dark current versus gain measured at $-33$\textcelsius\($\ocircle$), $-17$\textcelsius\($\Diamond$), $-8$\textcelsius\($\square$), 0\textcelsius\(\textasteriskcentered), 10\textcelsius\($\blacksquare$), and 17\textcelsius\($\blacklozenge$).}

\caption{\em LAAPD excess noise factor versus gain measured at $-12$\textcelsius\($\square$), 0\textcelsius\(\textasteriskcentered), and 10\textcelsius\($\blacksquare$).}

\caption{\em Ratio of the amplitudes of 14.4 and 6.4~keV signals versus LAAPD gain, measured at $-20$\textcelsius\($\Diamond$) and 1\textcelsius\(\textasteriskcentered).}

\caption{\em Ratio of 5.4~keV x--ray to visible--light gains versus LAAPD gain, measured at $-12$\textcelsius\($\square$), 1\textcelsius\(\textasteriskcentered), and 10\textcelsius\($\blacksquare$).}

39 — physics/0410106

\caption{\label{fig:Focus} Antenna focusing influence. (a)~DIII-D density profile~\cite{Doyle}. (b)~Turbulence amplitude assumed. (c)~Poloidal velocity profile ({\color{red}\full}), and velocity estimated using Doppler reflectometry signal frequency spectrum shift: {\color{blue}\textbullet}---using antenna focusing, {\color{blue}$\circ$}---without focusing.}

\caption{\label{fig:Nlin1} The signal spectrum evolution. (a)~Assumed density profile. $R$ denotes the major radius. (b)~Assumed poloidal velocity profile ({\color{red}\full}), cut-off positions ({\color{red}\textbullet}) and measured poloidal velocity profile in nonlinear ({\color{blue}\textbullet}) and linear ({\color{magenta}$\times$}) diagnostics regimes. (c)~Absolute value of frequency shift ({\color{red}\textbullet}) and width ({\color{blue}\textbullet}) of signal spectrum related to different probing frequencies (plotted via corresponding cut-off position).}

\caption{\label{fig:Nlin2} The signal spectrum evolution. (a)~Assumed density profile. $R$ denotes the major radius. (b)~Assumed poloidal velocity profile ({\color{red}\full}), cut-off positions ({\color{red}\textbullet}) and measured poloidal velocity profile in nonlinear ({\color{blue}\textbullet}) and linear ({\color{magenta}$\times$}) diagnostics regimes. (c)~Absolute value of frequency shift ({\color{red}\textbullet}) and width ({\color{blue}\textbullet}) of signal spectrum related to different probing frequencies (plotted via corresponding cut-off position).}

40 — astro-ph/0411389

\caption{Four different examples of blazar \gray activity as a function of exposure. {\it Top-left panel:} 3EG~J0845$+$7049 with $HSN=1$ despite its high exposure; {\it Top-right panel:} 3EG~J1733$-$1313 which, for a similar exposure, has $HSN=5$; {\it Bottom-left panel:} 3EG~J0530$+$1323 which showed a possible periodicity in its high-state status, and {\it Bottom-right panel: } 3EG~J0340$-$0201 which has a very low exposure ($\sim 64 \times 10^{7}$ cm$^{2}$s), but showed 2 high-states in a few observations. Crosses show the value of the discrete $\psi$ for each VP containing the source.}

\caption{\gray activity ($\psi$) vs. black hole mass ($M_{\rm BH}$) for \egret Pop. B blazars. A marginal correlation is present %%%C ($\rho=0.87$ and $P=0.0012$, Spearman statistic). The solid line represent %%%C the best fit line, $\log (\psi)=0.096\times \log ({\rm M_{\rm BH}})-0.065$. ($\rho=0.76$ and $P=0.01$, Spearman statistic). The solid line represents the best fit line, $\log (\psi)=0.013\times \log ({\rm M_{\rm BH}})-0.099$. Horizontal bars represent the typical black hole mass estimate uncertainty as reported by \cite{Vestergaard04}.}

41 — astro-ph/0411400

\caption{Spectrum ($E^2\times Flux$) of diffuse \grays\from the inner Galaxy as measured by the EGRET. Curves indicate individual components:$\pi^0$-decay (NN), electron bremsstrahlung (EB), inverse Compton (IC), and isotropic diffuse emission (ID). Adapted from \cite{hunter97}.}

\caption{The EGRET sky: diffuse \gray\emission\cite{M04rev}.}

\caption{Longitude profile of diffuse \gray\emission\cite{SMR04a}. Lines (top to bottom): total, $\pi^0$-decay, inverse Compton, bremsstrahlung, extragalactic background.}

\caption{Spectrum of extragalactic diffuse \gray\emission\cite{SMR04b}. Adopted from \cite{mannheim}.}

42 — cond-mat/0411374

\caption{Scaling behavior of the synchronization time. The thick curve denotes the universal function $f(\alpha)$ defined in \eref{eq:f}. It has been obtained by finite size scaling, which is shown in the inset for $\alpha = 0.5$ ($\circ$) and $\alpha = 0.6$ (\opensquare).}

\caption{Extrapolation of $f_L^{-1}$ to $L \rightarrow \infty$. Symbols denote the values extracted from \fref{fig:sync2} for the average synchronization times $100 L^2$ ($\circ$), $150 L^2$ (\opensquare) and $200 L^2$ (\opendiamond).}

\caption{Parameters $\mu$ and $\beta$ as a function of the synaptic depth $L$. Symbols denote the results of fits using \eref{eq:fermi} for the \emph{Geometric Attack} ($\circ$) and the \emph{Majority Flipping Attack} with $M=100$ (\opensquare). From these values we obtain $\alpha_\mathrm{s,flip} \approx 0.45$ (\full) and $\alpha_{\mathrm{s},M=100} \approx 0.38$ (\dotted) according to \eref{eq:prop}.}

43 — hep-lat/0411028

\caption{\label{fig:dwf_amplitudes}Results for the local (L) and smeared (S) pseudoscalar ({\large\color[named]{Cyan} $\blacktriangle$}, {\large\color[named]{Magenta} \boldmath $\vartriangle$}) and axial vector ({\color[named]{Blue} $\blacksquare$}, {\color[named]{Red} \boldmath $\square$}) pion source amplitudes $Z_A^{(i)}(\bvec{p})$ used in this study.}

44 — cond-mat/0412543

\caption{Profiles for a trap with $V_2a^2=0.0025t$ and $N_f=70$, the on-site repulsions are $U/t=$2 (\textcolor{blue}{$\triangle$}), 4 (\textcolor{red}{$\bigtriangledown$}), 6 (\textcolor{cyan}{\large $\Diamond$}), and 8 (\textcolor{green}{$\bigcirc$}). (a) Local density, (b) variance of the local density, (c) local compressibility $\kappa^\ell$ as defined in Eq.\(\ref{localc}), (d) variance of the density in the Mott-insulating state (when $U/t>0$) vs $U/t$. The dashed lines in (b) are the values of the variance in the $n=1$ periodic system for $U/t=2, \ 4,\ 6,\ 8$ (from top to bottom).}

\caption{The local compressibility $\kappa^{\ell}$ vs $\delta=1-n$ at $\delta \rightarrow 0$ for (\textcolor{blue}{$\triangle$}) $N_f = 70$, $U=8t$ and $V_2a^2=0.0025t$; (\textcolor{red}{$\bigtriangledown$}) $N_f = 70$, $U=6t$ and $V_2a^2=0.0025t$; (\textcolor{green}{$\bigcirc$}) $N_f=72$, $U=6 t$ and a quartic potential with $V_4a^4=1.0\times 10^{-6}t$; (\textcolor{cyan}{$\Diamond$}) unconfined periodic system with $U=6t$. The straight line displays a power-law behavior $\varpi=0.72$. Inset: Dependence of the critical exponent $\varpi$ on $\Delta \tau^2$.}

\caption{Variance $\Delta$ {\em vs.} $n$ for (\textcolor{green}{$\bigcirc$}) harmonic potential $V_2a^2=0.0025 t$ with $N=100$; (\textcolor{blue}{$\triangle$}) quartic potential $V_4a^4=5\times 10^{-7} t$ with $N=150$; (\textcolor{red}{$\bigtriangledown$}) harmonic potential $V_2a^2=0.016 t$ + cubic $V_3a^3 = 1.6\times 10^{-4} t$ + quartic $V_4a^4 = 1.92\times 10^{-5} t$ with $N=50$; and (full line) unconfined periodic potential with $N=102$ sites. The curves correspond from top to bottom to $U/t = 0, 2, 4, 8$. For a discussion of the insets, see text.}

\caption{Variance of the density vs $\delta=1-n$ at $\delta \rightarrow 0$ for (\textcolor{blue}{$\triangle$}) $N_f = 70$, $U=8t$ and $V_2a^2=0.0025t$; (\textcolor{red}{$\bigtriangledown$}) $N_f = 70$, $U=6t$ and $V_2a^2=0.0025t$; (\textcolor{green}{$\bigcirc$}) $N_f=72$, $U=6 t$ and a quartic potential with $V_4a^4=1.0\times 10^{-6}t$; (\textcolor{cyan}{$\Diamond$}) unconfined periodic system with $U=6t$. The straight line displays linear behavior, i.e.\its slope is equal to one.}

\caption{Phase diagram for a system with $N=100$, $V_2a^2=0.006 t$ (\textcolor{red}{$\bigtriangledown$}) and $N = 150$, $V_2a^2=0.002 t$ (\textcolor{green}{$\bigcirc$}) sites. The phases are explained in the text.}

\caption{Comparison between density (\textcolor{blue}{$\triangle$}) and variance (\textcolor{red}{$\bigtriangledown$}) profiles for a system with $U/t=8$ and a system with $U/t=\infty$ (continuous line). In both cases $V_2a^2=0.0025t$ and $N_f=70$.}

45 — cond-mat/0412661

\caption{Theoretical (black) versus experimental (gray) X-ray B-factors for $\a$ carbons in PtrHb, related through equation~\ref{eqn:B-factors}. Theoretical B-factors including coarse-grained heme group are shown for comparison (dashed). Helical segments have been marked on residues axis. The inset shows theoretical versus experimental B-factors for coarse-grained heme, \red{with pdb names of iron and carbons included in the coarse-graining.}}

\caption{ \red{ Normalized cross correlations between the proximal histidine F8 and the rest of the protein ($c_{68j}$, hence the peak raising to 1.0 at $j = 68$): residues displaying significant anti-correlations with His68 are labeled in the plot. Like Phe19 (B9), they are strongly conserved throughout the trHb family~\cite{pesce}, being relevant to prevent solvent access to the heme pocket (E14, EF7~\cite{pesce}), to stabilize heme bound ligand (E7~\cite{pesce}) and to build the gate between the heme pocket and an apolar cavity running inside the protein matrix (G12, H11~\cite{milani1}).} }

\caption{ \red{ Components of normalized eigenvectors for the first two slowest modes of motion (1, top; 2, bottom; ratio of corresponding eigenvalues: 1.16), which bring a similar contribute to the dominant opening mechanism of the distal cavity, driven by the anticorrelated motions of the proximal (pre-F loop, helix F, loop FG and last part of helix H) and distal sides (helix C, CD loop and helix E especially). Residues with bulky side chains, strongly conserved in the family of trHbs and belonging to the hydrophic cluster preventing solvent access to the heme pocket~\cite{pesce} are spatially located near the residues with biggest components, highlighted in the plot: Phe33 (CD1), Trp59 (EF7), Phe48 (E14). The latter acts as gating residue in trHbN from \emph{Mycobacterium Tuberculosis}~\cite{crespo}. } }

\caption{ \red{ Open (left) and closed (right) conformations of the distal cavity, obtained by adding or subtracting the rescaled eigenvector of the first slowest mode to the native positions of $\a$ carbons (scaling factor: 20). Most mobile regions in the first mode are coloured in red (loops) and purple (helices). Heme group and native structure are drawn in gray, as well as heme bound ligand stabilizing residues Tyr B10 and Gln E7 and hinges of the distal side opening mechanism - Pro EF3 and Gln G4 (figure drawn using VMD~\cite{vmd} and Raster3d~\cite{render}). } }

46 — nucl-ex/0412024

\caption{\label{Energiematrix} Calibrated $E_{3} - E_{4}$ coincidence matrix for the proton lab. angle pair 51.5\symbol{23}/51.5\symbol{23}.}