\caption{Virgo maps in the \gray\energy bands 3-10~MeV (left), 10-30~MeV (middle) as observed by COMPTEL, and$>$100~MeV (right) as provided by EGRET for the complete set of 7 weeks of continuous data (VPs 606 to 611.1). For COMPTEL the contour lines start at a detection significance of 3$\sigma$ ($\chi^2_1$-statistics for a known source) with a step of 0.5$\sigma$. For EGRET the contour lines also start at a detection significance of 3$\sigma$, however with a step of 1$\sigma$. The locations of the famous Virgo blazars 3C~273 (+) and 3C~279 ($\Delta$) are indicated. 3C~273 is detected with 10.4\sig\by EGRET. There is significant emission from 3C~273 in both COMPTEL maps. The COMPTEL 3-10~MeV map shows hints for additional sources.}
\caption{EGRET ($\Box$) and COMPTEL ($\circ$) light curves of 3C~273 in different \gray\bands. The definition of the 3 time periods (A, B, C) is given in the text. While a flare is clearly seen above 100~MeV by EGRET, no obvious flux increase is observed at energies below 30~MeV by COMPTEL. The errors are 1$\sigma$ and the upper limits are 2$\sigma$. }
\caption{\Lam{} (left) and \Ks{} (right) rapidity density distributions for different \Ngrey{} plotted in both log (top) and linear(bottom) scale. $N_{\rm grey} = $ $\bullet$ - 0, $\circ$ - 1, $\blacktriangledown$ - 2 and $\triangledown$ - 4.}
\caption{\Lam{} (left) and \Ks{} (right) multiplicities vs \Avgnungrey. $\blacktriangledown$ - in E910 acceptance, $\vartriangle$ - total yield (syst. errors from extrapolation included), $\circ$ - est. \Kzbar\component of\Ks. Lines: Solid - \Npart\scaling, dot-dashed - Binary collision, dashed - empirical fit to\Lam\(left panel, see text for details), est. \Npart\scaling for\Kzbar\(right panel). }
\caption{Simultaneous X-ray and \gray\spectrum of 3C~273 as observed during the January/February 1999 campaign. The data points from the different experiments are derived from their total observation times during the campaign, which are given in Table~\ref{tab1}. The RXTE (+) spectral points are derived from the observation sum of the three individual pointings, and are shown together with the best-fit power-law spectrum (solid line). EGRET did not detect the quasar at energies above 100~MeV providing an upper limit on the flux. For the upper limit line, drawn between 100~MeV and 1~GeV, a spectral power-law shape with photon index of 2.6 is assumed. The error bars are 1\sig. }
\caption{Quasi-simultaneous keV- to MeV-spectrum of the \gray\blazar 3C~279 as observed in early 1999. The data points from the different experiments are derived from their total observations times during the campaign, which are given in Table~\ref{tab1}. The RXTE (+) spectral points are derived from the observation sum of the three individual pointings, and are shown together with the best-fit power-law spectrum (solid line). The error bars are 1\sig\and the upper limits are 2\sig. Simultaneous EGRET observations exist (Table~\ref{tab1}), which will be reported elsewhere. The spectrum can be described by a single power-law shape from about 2.5~keV to 30~MeV.}
\caption{Broad-band spectrum of 3C~279 for different epochs. The 1999 results (filled stars) reported here fit nicely to the two previous measurements in 1991 and 1996 when 3C~279 was in a \gray\high state. The spectral points of the earlier measurements are taken from[4].}
\caption{\IRAS\color-color diagram for the 61 galaxies in the U.S. Key Project on normal galaxies ISOCAM sample.}
\caption{Color-color diagrams showing the comparison of \ISO\fluxes to\IRAS\12\m\fluxes. The dashed lines indicate the\ISOIRASa\and\ISOIRASb\values for a cirrus model (Reach 1999). The$\sigma$ values are the standard deviations in the ordinates between $-0.5<$ log \IRAScolor$<-0.2$.}
\caption{Mid-infrared versus far-infrared color-color diagrams. For a range of moderate heating intensity levels, $-0.5<$ log \IRAScolor$<-0.2$, normal galaxies have a similar mid-infrared color.}
\caption{A comparison of the 4.5 to 6.75 \m\emission as a function of the far infrared to blue ratio. A slight trend is seen in the expected sense (see text), whereby galaxies with a higher FIR/B exhibit comparatively more 4.5\m\emission. The expected 4.5 to 6.75\m\logarithmic ratio for photospheric emission (assuming a$T \sim 3500$ K blackbody; see Boselli et al. 1998) is 0.28, consistent with the findings of Madden, Vigroux \& Sauvage (1999) for early type galaxies.}
\caption{Average most massive progenitor mass vs.\redshift$z$. The solid curves denote the average mass of the most massive progenitor of all halos in the simulations greater than the mass cut $M \geq 2\times 10^{12} M_\odot$ (uniform volumes, left panel) or $M >$ 50 particles (voids, right panel). The dashed curves are the Monte-Carlo realizations of the same sample of halos. The errorbars for all curves at the $1-\sigma$ deviations of 1000 bootstrap samples of the $z=0$ halo sample. In the left panel, each pair of curves (\ie one dashed and one solid) represents a different cosmology from top to bottom view at $z=5$: OCDMu, SCDMu, TCDMu. In the right panel, the steep pair of curves denotes the SCDMv run, and the shallower the OCDMv run.}
\caption{Probability distribution of formation redshift $p(z_f) dz$ vs.\redshift$z$. In each model, the solid line and triangular points represent the uniform volume, while the solid line and starred points denote the void simulations. The Monte-Carlo results are indicated by errorcrosses, with solid representing the uniform volumes and dashed representing the voids. The horizontal errorcross components denote the bin boundaries which were used for both the Monte-Carlo and simulated halos. The vertical components enclose 90\% of 1000 bootstrap resamplings of the Monte-Carlo realizations. Thus, for EPS to match the simulated formation times the vertical errorbars must enclose 9 out of 10 points. Note that the horizontal scale for TCDM is half that of the other panels.}
\caption{Comparison of ZEUS jet shape data~\protect\cite{ZEUS} with QCD predictions for DIS jets reconstructed by the iterative cone algorithm. Jet cuts are: $-1<\eta<2$ and 14~GeV${}<E_T<{}$21~GeV. ZEUS data (circles) are compared with {\protect\textcolor{red}{LO (lower band)}} and {\protect\textcolor{blue}{NLO (dashed line)}} QCD predictions. The upper band represents the NLO jet shape with additional cuts that are not made on the data. The width of the bands corresponds to varying the renormalization scale between $\mu_r^2=\alpha_sQ^2/4$ and $\mu_r^2=4\alpha_sQ^2$. Taken from~\protect\cite{KZ}.}
\caption{The multiplicity of subjets in jets of at least 250~GeV $E_T$: the predictions of various Monte Carlo models are divided by the data. The error bars on the \textcolor{red}{central line} are those of the data. Taken from~\protect\cite{D02}.}
\caption{The dependence of $< P_{x} >$ on the normalized rapidity $y/y_{p}$ in the laboratory system in C-Ne collisions. {\Large\red $\circ$} -- for protons, {\bl $\bigtriangleup$} -- for $\pi^{-}$ mesons, {\Large\gre $\ast$} -- the QGSM data for protons. The lines represent linear fits of experimental data in the intervals $0.01\leq y/y_{p} \leq0.90$ for protons and $0.04\leq y/y_{p} \leq0.70$ for $\pi^{-}$ mesons. The curves show the 4th order polynomial fits.}
\caption{The dependence of $< P_{x} >$ on the normalized rapidity $y/y_{p}$ in the laboratory system in C-Cu collisions. {\Large\red $\circ$} -- for protons, {\bl $\bigtriangleup$} -- for $\pi^{-}$ mesons, {\Large\gre $\ast$} -- the QGSM data for protons. The lines represent linear fits of experimental data in the intervals $0.01\leq y/y_{p} \leq0.90$ for protons and $-0.06\leq y/y_{p} \leq0.6$ for $\pi^{-}$ mesons. The curves show the 4th order polynomial fits.}
\caption{Scaled flow values versus beam energy per nucleon, for different projectile/target systems: {\bla$\star$} -- Nb-Nb Plastic Ball, {\bl$\bullet$} -- Ni-Au EOS, {\br$\bigtriangleup$} -- Au-Au Plastic Ball, {\Large\ma $\circ$} -- Ni-Ni FOPI, {\ye$\bullet$} -- Ni-Cu EOS,{\Large\color{SpringGreen}\+} -- Au-Au EOS, {\Large\cy$\star$} -- Ar-Pb Streamer Chamber, the value at E=1.08 AGeV represents Ar-KCl Streamer Chamber, {\Large\red $\diamond$} -- C-Ne, C-Cu ( our result),{\Large\gre $\ast$} -- Au-Au E-895, the value at E=10 AGeV represents Au-Au from E-877. %$\times$ -- Pb-Pb NA49. To improve the distinction between data points at the same beam energy, some of the beam energy values have been shifted.}
\caption{The azimuthal distributions with respect to the reaction plane of midrapidity protons dN/d$\phi$ . {\Large\red $\circ$} -- for C-Ne ($-1\leq y_{cm}\leq1$), {\bl $\bigtriangleup$} -- for C-Cu ($-1\leq y_{cm}\leq1$) interactions, {\Large\gre $\ast$} -- the QGSM data. Also shown are the fits using the function {\bl$dN/d\phi=a_{0}(1+a_{1}cos\phi+a_{2}cos2\phi)$}.}
\caption{The azimuthal distributions with respect to the reaction plane of midrapidity $\pi^{-}$ mesons . {\Large\red $\circ$} -- for C-Ne ($-1\leq y_{cm}\leq1$), {\bl $\bigtriangleup$} -- for C-Cu ($-1\leq y_{cm}\leq1$) interactions, {\Large\gre $\ast$} -- the QGSM data. Also shown are the fits using the function {\bl$dN/d\phi=a_{0}(1+a_{1}cos\phi+a_{2}cos2\phi)$}.}
\caption{The dependence of the Elliptic flow excitation function v$_{2}$ on energy E$_{lab}$/A (GeV): {\Large\bla$\star$} -- FOPI,{\Large\br $\circ$} -- MINIBALL, {\cy $\bullet$} -- EOS, {\gre$\diamond$} %$\framebox(5,5){}}$ -- E-895, {\Large\bl$\ast$} -- E-877, {\ma$\bullet$} -- NA49, {\red$\bigtriangleup$} -- C-Ne, C-Cu (our results).}
\caption{Frequency shift versus PZT voltage for several TM (\fullsquare) or TE ($\circ$) whispering gallery modes Frequency intervals, characterizing the WGM spectrum of the microsphere are also shown, namely the free-spectral range FSR, the separation $\Delta_P$ between modes differing only in their polarizations, and $\Delta_m$ the frequency difference due to a change by one unit of $m$. TM modes are, as expected, more sensitive to stress than TE modes by a factor 1.6. }
\caption{Frequency shift for a pair of TM (\fullsquare) and TE ($\circ$) modes followed continuously over the maximum applied stress. }
\caption{Color-color plots of 47 Tuc/SMC and M15. The left-hand panels show the 47~Tuc and SMC stars plotted in the bottom panels of Fig. 6 as circular points and asterisks, respectively, and the right-hand panels show the M15 stars plotted in the bottom panels of Fig. 7. The dashed relations in the left-hand and right-hand panels are the linear, least-squares fits to the 47~Tuc and M15 data, respectively, using iterative 3-$\sigma$ rejection; the open points are those rejected during the fitting. The solid lines are the analogous relations which result when only the data between the vertical, dotted lines (0.6 $\leq$ (\mycolor)$_0$ $\leq$ 1.0) are used in the fitting. Coefficients of the fits are given in Table~3.}
\caption{The WFPC2-to-STIS transformations. The main-sequence ridge-line stars of 47~Tuc, M15 and the SMC are combined to derive the transformations between the STIS \mystis\magnitudes and the WFPC2\myv\and\myi\magnitudes. Stars from 47 Tuc are plotted as circles, those from M15 are shown as squares, and SMC members are represented by triangles. The solid curves are the quadratic, least-squares fits to the data, using iterative 3-$\sigma$ rejection; for clarity, points rejected during the fitting are not shown. The coefficients of the transformation relations are given in Table~3.}
\caption{Transformation relations from SYNPHOT. The solid lines in all panels are the final transformation relations derived here (see Figure~9 and Table~3), truncated at the approximate color limits of the data used to derive the relations; the open points are the calculated SYNPHOT colors of dwarf stars in the BPGS Spectrophotometric Atlas. The SYNPHOT data in the left-hand panels has been calculated using the default SYNPHOT STIS longpass (LP) filter response function (Leitherer et al. 2000), while the STIS LP filter response suggested by Bessell (2000, private communication) was used to calculate the SYNPHOT colors shown in the right-hand panels. The SYNPHOT data and the transformation relations have been normalized at (\mycolor)$_0$~=~0.3.}
\caption{Aperture corrections as a function of color. Aperture corrections are shown for stars in 47~Tuc (open circles) that were part of the sample used to derive our empirical transformations, STIS calibration stars (filled circles), and Tiny Tim PSFs (asterisks). From blue to red, the HST calibration stars are GRW~+70~5824, a white dwarf, CPD~--60~7585, an F8 star, and BD~--11~3759, an M4 star, and the Tiny Tim PSFs represent dwarf stars having spectral types A0, F8, G8, K7, and M3. $\Delta$\mystis\is the aperture correction required to transform a 2-pixel (0.$^{\prime\prime}$1) magnitude into a magnitude measured in a 0.$^{\prime\prime}$5 aperture; the horizontal line shows the corresponding aperture correction applied to our 2-pixel magnitudes of 47~Tuc stars (see Table~2).}
\caption[]{\The\IRAS\and\ISO-\IRAS\color-color diagrams for the\ISO\Key Project sample of normal galaxies. Included are the colors for a ``hyperluminous'' infrared galaxy (open square) and a radio quiet QSO (open triangle) derived from templates kindly provided by R. Cutri. The HyperLIRG template is a composite SED from data for three such objects:\IRAS\F15307+3252 (Cutri et al. 1994);\IRAS\F10214+4724 (Rowan-Robinson et al. 1993 and Telesco 1993) and\IRAS\P09104+4109 (Kleinmann et al. 1988). They are normalized and combined to the approximate luminosity of F15307+3252 (see the lower panel of Figure\ref{fig:model}). The radio quiet SED is taken from Elvis et al. (1994) and is a composite of a large number of observed radio quiet QSOs. Also included for reference are the global \IRAS\colors (from NED) for the quiescent galaxy M 81 (open circle), the starburst galaxy M 82 (cross), and a galaxy with an intermediate-level of star-formation activity: M100 (filled triangle).}
\caption[]{\A composite mid-infrared spectrum obtained from an average of ISOPHOT-S spectra for some 40 Key Project galaxies. The ordinate is the flux density within the 24\arcsec $\times$24\arcsec\ISOPHOT-S aperture, and the abscissa is the rest-frame wavelength. The dashed line indicates the gap in the wavelength coverage, while the dotted extension at longer wavelengths represents our small modification to add the 12.7\m\aromatic feature (e.g. Cesarsky et al. 1996) since our ISOPHOT-S spectra do not extend to that wavelength. See Lu et al. (2000) and Helou et al. (2000) for more details.}
\caption[]{\A demonstration that, in contrast to the\IRAScolor\ratio, the\IRAScolorc\ratio and the far-infrared luminosity show relatively large scatter for a given\ISOcolor, a ratio known to track the relative intensity of the interstellar radiation field (e.g. Contursi et al. 1998). Thus \IRAScolorc\and$L_{\rm FIR}$ are not optimal parameters by which to develop a sequence in star-formation activity level.}
\caption[]{\The connected solid points in Figure\ref{fig:synthetic} indicate synthetic average galaxy empirical spectra for each \IRAScolor\bin, determined via\IRAS\and\ISO\broad band flux measurements at 6.75, 12, 15, 25, 60, and 100\m; the values displayed are the flux densities $f_\nu$ times the nominal bandpass frequencies, without any attempt at color correction. We compute the displayed spectra by normalizing to the 60 $\mu$m flux and then averaging within the \IRAScolor\bins. The spectra are arbitrarily vertically shifted for spacing purposes. Error bars stem from the 1$\sigma$ dispersions within each bin, divided by the square root of the number of objects within the bin; the error bars represent the bin spread in ${f_\nu (\lambda)} \over {f_\nu (60 \mu {\rm m})}$ for each $\lambda$. There is no dispersion at 60 $\mu$m due to our normalization scheme, and little dispersion at 100 \m\because of the sorting scheme.}
\caption[]{\A comparison of our model (solid lines) with the prior work of DBP90 (dotted lines). The upper two lines correspond to a heating intensity of$U=1000$, whereas the lower two lines reflect the models' prediction for $U=1$. The large discrepancy between the $U=1000$ models from 5 to 15 \m\is due to our implementation of increased PAH destruction for regions of increased heating intensity.}
\caption[]{\Top: A sampling of the galaxy model spectra, arbitrarily normalized at the 6.2\m\feature. These seven spectra have far-infrared colors similar to those of the seven average empirical spectra displayed in Figure\ref{fig:synthetic}. Bottom: A comparison between our model for an actively star-forming normal galaxy and SEDs for a hyperluminous infrared galaxy and a radio quiet QSO (see Figure \ref{fig:iso-iras}). The normal galaxy here is the topmost curve in the upper panel normalized to have $L_{\rm FIR}=10^{12} L_\odot$, typical for galaxies in the \IRAS\1.2 Jy survey with log\IRAScolor $\simeq0.1$.}
\caption[]{\A comparison of the model with the\IRAS\and\ISO\color-color diagrams. The sequence of open circles, starting from the upper lefthand corner in each panel, indicate model colors that correspond to power law exponent values of$\alpha=$[2.5,2.0,1.5,1.0].}
\caption[]{\Predicted\SIRTF\color-color diagrams. The smooth solid line indicates the zero redshift trend defined by the sequence of normal star-forming galaxies; the dotted lines are redshift tracks (from$z=0$ to 1) for the seven representative normal galaxies of Figure \ref{fig:model}.}
\caption[]{\Far-infrared to radio relation as a function of redshift. The spread in$q$ at zero redshift is sized to reflect the 1$\sigma$ scatter in the ratio for nearby galaxies, and for illustrative purposes we have assigned the more quiescent (active) systems to exhibit ratios higher (lower) than the median trend; we have tracked the redshift dependence of the 1$\sigma$ envelope by mapping the $\langle q \rangle + 1\sigma$ ratio to our $\alpha=2.31$ model and the $\langle q \rangle - 1\sigma$ ratio to our $\alpha=1.06$ model. Though this mapping is artificial, there is evidence for this type of behavior from observations that galaxies with relatively low far-infrared luminosities have on average even lower radio luminosities, as suggested by the analysis of Condon, Anderson \& Helou (1991).}
\caption{Roadrunner benchmarks using a single CPU per node. \ifcolor{} \else{ (Dashes denote FastEthernet.)} \fi }
\caption{Roadrunner benchmarks using dual CPUs. \ifcolor{} \else{ (Dashes denote FastEthernet.)} \fi }
\caption{The distribution of angular separation, $\theta$, for matched \twomass--\twodF\galaxies. The solid histogram is the distribution for the whole catalogue and the dotted histogram for the subset of\twomass\galaxies with semi-major axes larger than 12~arcsec.}
\caption{The distribution of J-band apparent magnitude, J$-$\K\colour and J-band surface brightness,$\mu_{\rm J}$, for various sub-samples of the \twomass\catalogue. Here, the measure of surface brightness used is simply$\mu_{\rm J}\equiv {\rm J} - 5 \log_{10}r$, where J is the Kron magnitude and $r$ the Kron semi-major axis in arc seconds (j\_m\_e and j\_r\_e in the 2MASS database). In all three rows, the thick solid histograms are the distributions for\twomass\objects that are matched with\twodF\galaxies. The light solid histograms in the top row are the\fractwo \% of \twomass\galaxies that are not matched with\twodF\galaxies. Poisson errorbars are shown on these histograms. The dashed histograms are for the bright sub-sample with J$<$12. In the middle row, the light histograms show the distributions for the \fracsix \% of \twomass\galaxies fainter than J$=$12 and satisfying the additional image classification constraints discussed in the text that are not matched with \twodF\galaxies. In the bottom row, the light histograms show the distributions of the\fracredshift \% of the matched \twomass--\twodF\galaxies for which redshifts have been measured. The values in each histogram are the fraction of the corresponding sample that falls in each bin.}
\caption{The solid histogram shows the distribution of \B-J colours for \twomass\galaxies selected to have J$<$$14.7$. (Here, we use the \twomass\default magnitude, denoted j\_m in the\twomass\database.) The vertical dashed line indicates the colour at which this sample starts to become incomplete due to the\B$<$$19.45$ magnitude limit of \twodF. }
\caption{A comparison of the \twomass\default, Kron and extrapolated magnitudes in the J and\K\bands. The dots are the measured values for each of the galaxies in the matched\twomass--\twodF\catalogue. The solid and dotted lines indicate the median, 10 and 90 percentiles of the distribution.}
\caption{Comparison of \twomass\Kron and extrapolated magnitudes with the independent measurements of Loveday (2000). The left hand panels are for the\K-band Kron and extrapolated magnitudes (k\_m\_e and k\_m\_ext in the\twomass\database). The right hand panels show Kron and extrapolated magnitudes inferred from the\twomass\J-band Kron and extrapolated magnitudes and the measured default aperture J$-$\K\colours (j\_m\_e$-$j\_m$+$k\_m and j\_m\_ext$-$j\_m$+$k\_m in the\twomass\database variables). The horizontal errorbars show the measurement errors quoted by Loveday (2000). The solid lines show simple least squares fits. The slopes and zero-point offsets of these fits and the rms residuals about the fits are indicated on each panel. The inset plots show the distribution of residual magnitude differences.}
\caption{Differential galaxy number counts in the J and \K\bands, all with Poisson errorbars and with a Euclidean slope subtracted so as to expand the scale of the ordinate. The J and\K\counts linked by the solid line are the\twomass\7~arcsec aperture counts of Jarrett\etal (in preparation). The counts linked by the dashed and dotted lines are those of the \twomass--\twodF\redshift catalogue for Kron and extrapolated magnitudes respectively. The\K-band magnitudes are those inferred from the J-band magnitudes and aperture colours. In the \K-band these are compared with the counts of Gardner \etal (1996) and Glazebrook \etal (1994) as indicated in the figure legend.}
\caption{The redshift distribution of the \K$<$$13.2$ (Kron) sample selected from the matched \twomass--\twodF\catalogue. The smooth curve is the model prediction based on the SWML estimate of the\K-band luminosity function (c.f. Section~\ref{sec:lf_est}). The model prediction is very insensitive to the assumed k+e correction and cosmology. }